Why is this always the case A=[itex]\begin{array}{cc}1 & 6

  • Thread starter Thread starter KingBigness
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the elements of matrix A and its eigenvalues. It highlights that A's structure leads to specific dependencies among its elements, particularly that A_{11} and A_{12} are multiples of A_{21} and A_{22}. This relationship is tied to the concept of eigenvalues, where the matrix A - λI must be non-invertible for eigenvectors to exist. The condition of linear dependence among rows is crucial for determining eigenvalues and eigenvectors. The explanation clarifies the mathematical principles behind these observations, emphasizing their significance in solving eigenvector problems.
KingBigness
Messages
94
Reaction score
0
Why is this always the case...

A=\begin{array}{cc}<br /> 1 &amp; 6 \\<br /> 4 &amp; 3 \\<br /> \end{array}

λ_{1}=7

λ_{2}=-3

A=\begin{array}{cc}<br /> 1-7 &amp; 6 \\<br /> 4 &amp; 3-7 \\<br /> \end{array}

A=\begin{array}{cc}<br /> -6 &amp; 6 \\<br /> 4 &amp; -4 \\<br /> \end{array}

Why is A_{11} and A_{12}
always a multiple of
A_{21} and A_{22}?

Is this a feature of Eigenvalues or is this done on purpose to make solving the eigenvectors easier?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


KingBigness said:
Why is A_{11} and A_{12}
always a multiple of
A_{21} and A_{22}?
You seem to mean (A-\lambda I)_{11}, (A-\lambda I)_{12} and so on.

Ax=\lambda x implies (A-\lambda I)x=0. So if A-\lambda I is invertible, x=0. An eigenvector of A with eigenvalue \lambda is by definition a non-zero x that satisfies Ax=\lambda x. So A has an eigenvector with eigenvalue \lambda if and only if A-\lambda I is not invertible. For a matrix to be not invertible, its rows must be linearly dependent.
 


Clear as day now, thank you
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K