Why Is Total Kinetic Energy Conserved in Some Collisions but Not in Others?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Total kinetic energy is conserved in elastic collisions, where the total kinetic energy before and after the collision remains equal. Inelastic collisions, however, result in a loss of kinetic energy due to factors such as friction and sound energy dissipation. The discussion emphasizes that energy can be transformed into other forms, and the presence of features like a "smooth surface" indicates minimal energy loss, suggesting an elastic collision. Understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing collision scenarios in physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of elastic and inelastic collisions
  • Basic principles of conservation of momentum
  • Knowledge of energy transformation and dissipation
  • Familiarity with experimental setups in physics, such as air tracks
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences between elastic and inelastic collisions in detail
  • Explore the concept of energy dissipation in mechanical systems
  • Learn about the role of friction in energy loss during collisions
  • Investigate experimental methods to demonstrate conservation of momentum and energy
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of collision dynamics and energy conservation in mechanical systems.

jack1234
Messages
132
Reaction score
0
For this question
http://tinyurl.com/2btmot
the solution for question 6(c) is assume conservation of energy(total kinetic energy before collision = total kinetic energy after collision)

I am very confused here.

May I know why sometimes when two body collides, the total kinetic energy before collision is not equal to the total kinetic energy after the collision(although their momentum is equal)? Where are the kinetic energy goes?

For this question, what make us think that this is an elastic collision?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Energy is always conserved, as you know. However, it doesn't have to stay in the same form; it's sometimes dissipated from a system. Replace your airtrack with sandpaperand you'd quickly conclude that friction would be massive, so loads of energy would be wasted overcoming that. If the spring wasn't there, the gliders would crack together, and energy would be lost as sound; my old school used magnets instead to achieve the same effect.
In general, think about where energy can be lost from your system. If the question includes features that minimise those losses (the classic keyword is "smooth surface") then you're being encouraged to assume an elastic collision.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K