B Why is V(1/5X) equal to 1/25*V(X)?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Addez123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Variance
Addez123
Messages
199
Reaction score
21
TL;DR Summary
I don't understand how V(1/5X) can be turned into 1/25*V(X).
Shouldn't I just extract the 1/5 so:
V(1/5X) = 1/5*V(X) ?

V stands for variance.
In my book, when calculating the variance of X = (x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5)/5
in an example it says:

V(X) = V(1/5(X_1 + X_2 + X_3 + X_4 + X_5)) = 1/25*V(X_1) + 1/25*V(X_2) + 1/25*V(X_3) + 1/25*V(X_4) + 1/25*V(X_5) = 1/5Ф

I don't understand how V(1/5X) can be turned into 1/25*V(X), shouldn't I just extract the 1/5 so:
V(1/5X) = 1/5*V(X) ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
According to the properties of the variance it is ##V(aX)=a^2V(X)##. This follows from the definition of variance and the properties of the mean E(X).
It is ##V(X)=E(X^2)-E(X)^2##
and $$V(aX)=E((aX)^2)-E(aX)^2=E(a^2X^2)-a^2E(X)^2=a^2E(X^2)-a^2E(X)^2=a^2(E(X^2)-E(X)^2)=a^2V(X)$$
 
  • Like
Likes Addez123 and Dale
Addez123 said:
Summary:: I don't understand how V(1/5X) can be turned into 1/25*V(X).
Shouldn't I just extract the 1/5 so:
V(1/5X) = 1/5*V(X) ?

V stands for variance.

In my book, when calculating the variance of X = (x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5)/5
in an example it says:

V(X) = V(1/5(X_1 + X_2 + X_3 + X_4 + X_5)) = 1/25*V(X_1) + 1/25*V(X_2) + 1/25*V(X_3) + 1/25*V(X_4) + 1/25*V(X_5) = 1/5Ф

I don't understand how V(1/5X) can be turned into 1/25*V(X), shouldn't I just extract the 1/5 so:
V(1/5X) = 1/5*V(X) ?
What's definition of variance?
 
Variance is based on values of ##X^2## and ##(1/5*X)^2 = 1/25*X^2##.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top