Why isn't momentum quantized in quantum mechanics?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of momentum in quantum mechanics, specifically addressing why momentum is not quantized for free particles. The integral representation of the wave function, Ψ(x,t)=(2πħ)^-½ ∫ e^{i[px-Et]/ħ} *Φ(p) dp, illustrates that momentum is treated as a continuous variable rather than discrete quanta. Participants clarify that while energy can be quantized in specific scenarios, momentum remains continuous in the case of free particles, aligning with the principles of the uncertainty principle.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics fundamentals
  • Familiarity with wave functions and probability distributions
  • Knowledge of Fourier transforms in quantum theory
  • Basic grasp of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the quantization of energy in bound systems, such as the hydrogen atom
  • Explore the implications of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the role of continuous variables in wave mechanics
  • Investigate the differences between free particles and bound states in quantum systems
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, physicists exploring wave-particle duality, and anyone seeking to understand the relationship between momentum and wave functions in quantum theory.

Darren93
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
I'm going through a textbook, on what is pretty much my first course in Quantum mechanics. I've got to a section were it says that in order for a sinusoidal wave function to correspond to a non infinite probability distribution, there must be a range of momentum, or at least more than 1 momentum term on x.. Which I understand, that makes complete sense. However the next bit they utilize an integral term to sum momentum over a unit step like distribution. That is they consider the wave function to be built up from an integral w.r.t momentum, composed of various sinusoidal terms. This integral considers momentum to be a continuous range.

Equation of concern (probably makes little sense): Ψ(x,t)=(2πħ)^-½ ∫ e^{i[px-Et]/ħ} *Φ(p) dp

However why isn't momentum quantized? Surely energy exists in steps related to h, which will extend to quantum's of momentum. Hence in a momentum range, a sum would be needed.

Am I wrong in thinking that momentum is quatized, or is it that the integral is a close match to the sum due to the size of h? The reason I'm annoyed at this is that they use this to relate wave function and momentum together in a Fourier transform manner. Which I presume is the basis for Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. I feel uneasy about leaving such a hole in my knowledge with the significance this derivation poses.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Darren93 said:
However why isn't momentum quantized? Surely energy exists in steps related to h, which will extend to quantum's of momentum.

You are getting ahead of yourself. Energy is only quantized in certain cases. Your textbook will discuss some examples soon if it is any good. For a free particle, energy and momentum are *not* quantized.

Darren93 said:
The reason I'm annoyed at this is that they use this to relate wave function and momentum together in a Fourier transform manner. Which I presume is the basis for Heisenberg's uncertainty principle.

Yes. You are basically working through a special case of the uncertainty principle here.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Darren93
Thanks for the reply, so momentum doesn't exist in quanta's then? Makes sense as when I googled it I found nothing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
7K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K