Why Isn't My Ornithopter Generating Lift?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Afaq
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flight
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges faced in designing and operating an ornithopter, specifically focusing on its inability to generate lift. Participants explore various factors affecting flight performance, including weight, wing design, and materials used, as well as potential amendments to improve functionality.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the ornithopter is too heavy at 700g and suggests that the size may hinder lift generation without wing flexion.
  • Another participant proposes that the wing dynamics may be problematic, indicating that equal thrust on the upstroke and downstroke could negate any weight reduction efforts.
  • Suggestions are made to improve wing flexion by adding a second joint to the wings and to consider using lighter materials instead of parachute cloth.
  • There is a discussion about the importance of wing design, with some participants emphasizing the need for asymmetrical vortex generation through wing deformation during flight.
  • One participant suggests that the ornithopter should have an angle of attack and incorporate elliptical motion in the wing flapping pattern to enhance lift.
  • Concerns are raised about the practical applications and monetization potential of ornithopters, with some viewing them as primarily a curiosity or hobbyist interest.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that weight and wing dynamics are significant issues affecting lift generation. However, there is no consensus on the best approach to resolve these issues, as multiple competing views and suggestions are presented throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the specific materials and designs that would best improve lift, as well as the effectiveness of proposed modifications. The discussion includes various assumptions about the mechanics of flight that remain unresolved.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to hobbyists, educators, and engineers involved in aerodynamics, ornithopter design, or those exploring the practical applications of flying models.

Afaq
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
i have designed and fabricated an ornithopter with flapping frequency of 4Hz and span of 1m... Actuation of wings is perfectly fine but it is unable to generate lift...what are the possible amendments should i do to make it fly...and it is a bit over weight i-e 700g...
 

Attachments

  • 2013-07-05 15.31.04.jpg
    2013-07-05 15.31.04.jpg
    28.1 KB · Views: 2,788
  • 2013-07-05 15.31.30.jpg
    2013-07-05 15.31.30.jpg
    18 KB · Views: 969
Engineering news on Phys.org
Tie it to helium balloons.
 
Its too heavy and the thing itself looks to big to generate lift without flexion of the wings
 
But i am not an expert on unsteady low RE flight
 
I'm no expert either, but I agree, the biggest problem is probably weight. But a close second is the wing dynamics. You're probably getting just as much downward thrust on the wing upstroke as you are in the downstroke. Any way you can allow/induce more flexion in the wings on the upstroke?
 
You could probably easily do this just inserting a second joint about 1/3 down the way. Take a look at some photographs of birds that are a similar dimension. Also, what airfoil are you using?
 
Aero51 said:
You could probably easily do this just inserting a second joint about 1/3 down the way. Take a look at some photographs of birds that are a similar dimension. Also, what airfoil are you using?

i am using parachute cloth without any airfoil.
 
Travis_King said:
I'm no expert either, but I agree, the biggest problem is probably weight. But a close second is the wing dynamics. You're probably getting just as much downward thrust on the wing upstroke as you are in the downstroke. Any way you can allow/induce more flexion in the wings on the upstroke?

Yes, you are right weight is the biggest issue but i am unable to reduce the weight. As in the wings, i am using the parachute cloth which is heavy and is not generating required lift...suggest me the material for the wing.Thanx
 
If you are producing equal amounts of vertical force on the upstroke and downstroke, and it looks like you probably are, then reducing the weight won't really matter. As was mentioned above you need to improve the wing design. It is looking pretty cool though, good luck!
 
  • #10
RandomGuy88 said:
you need to improve the wing design.

you mean to say that the fabriction of designed wing is not good or the design itself...how can i improve it??
 
  • #11
You need the wing to flex or deform the reason why lift is generated is because of the asymetric vorticies generated by different wing flexions on the upstroke and downstroke.
 
  • #12
Also, any heavy materials you may be using are a bad choice. Lightweight is the name of the game in all of aeronautics. Sometimes one might trade a little weight for some performance gain elsewhere (firepower, maneuverability, etc) but weight is always a major concern.

Many RC enthusiasts use shrink wrap plastic covering sheets to cover their wing and fuselage structures.
 
  • #13
for test flight of ornithopter i should throw it with head-wind or tail-wind ??
 
  • #14
Afaq said:
i have designed and fabricated an ornithopter with flapping frequency of 4Hz and span of 1m... Actuation of wings is perfectly fine but it is unable to generate lift...what are the possible amendments should i do to make it fly...and it is a bit over weight i-e 700g...

1] You need to arrange wings such that they should have some angle of attack.
2] Only straight up-down flapping won't work, give in little elliptical motion, i.e while downstroke they will come down via front perimeter of Circle and when they go up they will use back perimeter. Hint: Bird's doesn't just flap wings up and down, they use slightly circular motion.
3] The frame you used seems to be heavy, in reality you don't need it for proof of concept, you can get rid of it. Just attache your motor/gear to the rod.
4] Instead of cloth, you can use polythene, which will be way more lighter than cloth.
5] Instead of aluminium, you can use light weight wood e.g. balsa wood or similar or plastic straws together.
6] Implement all of the above points and your bird will start flying as you see other birds...

Best luck.
 
  • #15
Can someone tell me if there is any value (monetization possibility) in such models or are they strictly a curiosity? Because I see many people absolutely amazed by ornithopters, but I see no practical use for them.
 
  • #16
strive said:
Can someone tell me if there is any value (monetization possibility) in such models or are they strictly a curiosity? Because I see many people absolutely amazed by ornithopters, but I see no practical use for them.

Toy industry. Hobby. Educational with practical.
Do you see people fly small helicopters indoor as well as outdoor? The value is just pure Joy and people pay for that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
10K
Replies
33
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
10K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K