Why isn't the light signal from a falling spaceship Doppler shifted?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Doppler shift of light signals emitted from a spaceship falling under gravity. Participants explore the implications of acceleration on the perceived frequency of light signals between astronauts in the spaceship and an observer on Earth, considering both theoretical and conceptual aspects of the Doppler effect in non-inertial frames.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the light signal sent from Harry to Sally should be blue-shifted due to Sally's acceleration relative to Harry, as she is falling faster than the light signal at the moment of emission.
  • Others argue that Sally does not perceive a blue shift because the gravitational potential at her position compensates for the Doppler effect, leading to no net frequency shift.
  • One participant notes that the regular Doppler shift equations apply to inertial reference frames, implying that Sally's frame is not inertial due to acceleration.
  • Another viewpoint is that Barry, the observer on Earth, sees the light signal as blue-shifted due to Sally's acceleration, but since Harry and Sally are stationary relative to each other, they do not observe a frequency change.
  • There is a suggestion that for Kelly, another observer, to see the light as red-shifted, she would need to be at a higher gravitational potential and not accelerating, which would lead to a combination of gravitational redshift and classical Doppler redshift.
  • Some participants question the assumptions made about the frames of reference and the conditions under which the Doppler effect is observed, highlighting the complexities involved in the scenario.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the application of the Doppler effect in this scenario, with no consensus reached on whether Sally should observe a frequency shift or what compensates for it. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact nature of the frequency shifts experienced by the observers.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the definitions of inertial and non-inertial frames, the assumptions about the relative motion of the observers, and the complexities of gravitational effects on light propagation. The discussion does not resolve the mathematical implications of these assumptions.

sweetdreams12
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Just some conceptual ideas that I don't understand

A spaceship starts falling under gravity with an acceleration g as measured by an observer Barry at rest on Earth. At the instant that the ship starts to fall, an astronaut Harry at the base of the rocket ship sends a light signal of frequency w vertically upward to another astronaut Sally a distance h above.

Barry argues that the light signal reaching Sally ought to be Doppler shifted toward the blue. This Doppler shift Δw is given by (Δw/w)_Doppler = (Δu/c)

where Δu is the velocity of the rocket ship after a time Δt = (h/c)

But Sally does not see this shifted frequency. So why is this? What compensates for the Doppler shift in frequency? And if another observer (let's call her Kelly) was to see the red-shifted light, what is required for her?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: the regular doppler shift equations assume inertial reference frames.
 
Simon Bridge said:
Hint: the regular doppler shift equations assume inertial reference frames.

meaning they are non-accelerating...so Sally isn't accelerating hence she can't see the shifted frequency?
 
No - doppler shift is noticeable in non-accelerated frames.
That is how it is usually worked out.

I mean Harry and Sally are both following a special path in space-time.
What level are you doing this at?
 
sweetdreams12 said:
Just some conceptual ideas that I don't understand

A spaceship starts falling under gravity with an acceleration g as measured by an observer Barry at rest on Earth. At the instant that the ship starts to fall, an astronaut Harry at the base of the rocket ship sends a light signal of frequency w vertically upward to another astronaut Sally a distance h above.

Barry argues that the light signal reaching Sally ought to be Doppler shifted toward the blue. This Doppler shift Δw is given by (Δw/w)_Doppler = (Δu/c)

where Δu is the velocity of the rocket ship after a time Δt = (h/c)

But Sally does not see this shifted frequency. So why is this? What compensates for the Doppler shift in frequency? And if another observer (let's call her Kelly) was to see the red-shifted light, what is required for her?

If I correctly understand your set-up:

x Sally (for simplification: also falling down from t=0)
¦ continuous light signal sent up by Harry
x Harry (falling down from t=0)

x Barry (on Earth)
---------

1. Barry could argue that the light for Sally ought to be blue-shifted, based on the Doppler effect for accelerated objects: Sally is falling faster than Harry's light emitter at the moment of emission, thus a blueshift.

2. Sally is also higher up than Harry. The higher gravitational potential results in a blueshift of her eye's colour reference. According to the equivalence principle, this blueshift due to gravitation is equal to the Doppler effect due to acceleration, and thus Sally does not see a shifted frequency.

Next you ask about "the red-shifted light"; however, it's not clear in what situation. Maybe you want to know in what situation Kelly, maybe also straight above Harry, should be to see the light redshifted.

If Kelly is higher up and not falling, then she'll see the sum of increasing gravitational redshift and classical Doppler redshift, because Harry is falling and accelerating away from her.
PS: I assumed "non-relativistic" speed.
 
Last edited:
sweetdreams12 said:
meaning they are non-accelerating...so Sally isn't accelerating hence she can't see the shifted frequency?
The rocket frame, where the astronauts are both at rest, is inertial. So based on their rest frame the astronauts conclude there should be no Doppel-Shift.

The surface observes frame is not inertial. He sees a local gravitational field and gravitational time dilation, which cancels the Doppel-effect, from the velocity difference emitter (during emission) and receiver (during receive). So he also concludes there should be no detectable Doppel-Shift.
 
Barry reckons that Sally should see a doppler shift because they are accelerating - so Sally intercepts the wavefronts from Barry's signal faster, for a higher frequency. However, Harry and Sally are stationary wrt each other, so they are not at all surprised that Sally reports the same wavelength that Harry sent.

What gives? Either there was a doppler shift or their wasn't!

Barry thinks a bit and slaps his forehead: "of course!" he cries, "the doppler shift was compensated by..." something something something ... which is what the question is asking about. What is the something something that Barry realized?
Barry expects Sally to report a blue-shift ... she didn't... therefore there must have been a compensating red shift. What would cause that?
What is present in Barry's frame that is not present in the ship frame? Starts with "g".

For Sally to see a blue shift - she needs to have a different relationship to Harry. If she broke up with him, he'd get blue quite fast... but I think the easiest answer is to figure what direction shift Barry sees. There's several ways that Sally could see a bluer signal: how many can you think of?

There are a few wrinkles since the description does not mention the relative angular motion.
One is tempted to imagine the ship is falling directly towards Barry - but we remember that Barry's reference frame is rotating wrt the center of mass frame of the Earth.

This isn't the homework section, so we can go a bit easier on you here... but it is still more useful for you if you make certain connections yourself.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
4K