Why Longer Barrels in Superguns & Big Bertha?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Soaring Crane
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the advantages of longer barrels in artillery, specifically in the context of Iraq's supergun and Germany's Big Bertha cannon. Key reasons for utilizing longer barrels include reducing frictional losses, allowing expanding gases from gunpowder to exert force for an extended duration, and increasing the projectile's velocity and kinetic energy. The consensus indicates that the correct answer to the question posed is option b, as longer barrels enable the gases to act on the projectile for a longer time, enhancing its acceleration and stability.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics principles related to projectile motion
  • Familiarity with artillery mechanics and design
  • Knowledge of gas dynamics in relation to combustion
  • Awareness of historical artillery systems, specifically WWI technology
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the physics of projectile motion and acceleration
  • Study the design and mechanics of modern artillery systems
  • Explore gas dynamics and its impact on projectile performance
  • Investigate historical advancements in artillery technology during WWI
USEFUL FOR

Military historians, engineers in the field of ballistics, and enthusiasts of artillery technology will benefit from this discussion, as it provides insights into the mechanics and historical context of long-barreled artillery systems.

Soaring Crane
Messages
461
Reaction score
0
Iraq was reportedly developing a “supergun” with a barrel some 70 m long, which was to be able to launch huge artillery shells several hundred miles. During WWI, Germany used a “Big Bertha” cannon to hurl shells into Paris 30 miles away. This gun also had a long barrel. What is the reason for using a longer barrel in these guns?

a.To reduce frictional losses.
b.To allow the force of the expanding gases from the gunpowder to act for a longer time.
c.To increase the force exerted on the bullet due to the expanding gases from the gunpowder.
d. To reduce the force exerted on the bullet due to the expanding gases from the gunpowder.
e.To provide a more favorable ratio of kinetic energy to potential energy.

I do know that a greater velocity and, therefore, greater kinetic energy results from a longer barrel. Could it possibly be E.?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wouldn't a longer barrel maximize the acceleration of the projectile from the charge? The moment the projectile leaves the muzzle, the charge dissipates and the projectile goes into ballistic motion. A short barrel would waste all that charge.
 
I think the acceleration increases but I am unsure of what exactly happens in the projectile (from what I read from this article):

http://home.howstuffworks.com/revolver2.htm

"The inside of the barrel is lined with spiraling grooves, which spin the bullet to give it stability. A longer barrel improves stability, since it spins the bullet for longer. Extending the barrel also increases the speed of the bullet, since the gas pressure accelerates the bullet for a longer period of time."
 
That quoted passage should make it clear which answer is correct.
 
From the excerpt, would the answer be b. in which the gases act on the shell for a longer time period?
 
That's what I would say.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K