Why Must Ladder Operators Have Specific Forms in Quantum Mechanics?

Click For Summary
Ladder operators in quantum mechanics are defined as \sqrt{\dfrac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}(x+\dfrac{ip}{m\omega}) for the creation operator and \sqrt{\dfrac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}(x-\dfrac{ip}{m\omega}) for the annihilation operator. These forms are derived from the Schrödinger Equation, with the annihilation operator acting on the ground state Gaussian wave function to yield zero. The creation operator is the Hermitian conjugate of the annihilation operator, and the distinction between their signs is crucial; the plus sign indicates the creation operator, while the minus sign indicates the annihilation operator. Choosing appropriate units can simplify the expressions, allowing for a clearer understanding of their roles in quantum mechanics. The normalization constants are secondary to the functional forms of the operators and their implications in the harmonic oscillator model.
nklohit
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Why must the ladder operators be
\sqrt{\dfrac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}(x+\dfrac{ip}{m\omega}) and
\sqrt{\dfrac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}(x-\dfrac{ip}{m\omega})?
What is the method that obtain them from schrodinger Equation?
And why we know that they are creation and anihilation operator?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe this can be useful:

http://www.oru.se/oru-upload/Institutioner/Naturvetenskap/Dokument/Fysik/PJ/Kvantmekanik/stegop.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
nklohit said:
Why must the ladder operators be
\sqrt{\dfrac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}(x+\dfrac{ip}{m\omega}) and
\sqrt{\dfrac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}(x-\dfrac{ip}{m\omega})?
What is the method that obtain them from schrodinger Equation?
And why we know that they are creation and anihilation operator?

Don't worry about all the constants out front, they don't really matter too much, since they are just a convenient normalization.

The important point is that one of those operators you wrote down gives zero when it acts on a Gaussian (which is the ground state of the simple harmonic oscillator). That operator is that "annihilation operator" or "lowering operator."

The other operator is the annihilation operator's Hermitian conjugate and is called the "creation operator" or "raising operator."
 
olgranpappy said:
Don't worry about all the constants out front, they don't really matter too much, since they are just a convenient normalization.

why would you say that? they follow from the true hamiltonian
 
quetzalcoatl9 said:
why would you say that?

I said that because I believe it is important to realize the difference between important aspects of this problem and trivial aspects or this problem.

Of course, in the end, you want to get the trivial aspects correct as well.

Perhaps what I should have said was: "chose your units in such a way that you can set all the messy crap out front equal to one." Or, better yet, choose your units such that the unit of mass is m and the unit of time is 1/\omega and the unit of angular momentum is 2\hbar, in which case:

<br /> a=x+\frac{d}{dx}<br />

and
<br /> a^{\dagger}= x - \frac{d}{dx}<br />

and the ground state is
<br /> \psi_0(x)=\sqrt{\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi}}}e^{-x^2/2}<br />

My point was that one of those operators has a relative minus sign which is important because that one doesn't annihilate the ground state and the other has a relative plus sign which then does annihilate the ground state.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K