Why Must Ladder Operators Have Specific Forms in Quantum Mechanics?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the specific forms of ladder operators in quantum mechanics, particularly in the context of the simple harmonic oscillator. Participants are exploring the derivation of these operators from the Schrödinger Equation and their identification as creation and annihilation operators.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the necessity of the specific forms of the ladder operators and the methods used to derive them. There is also a discussion about the significance of constants in the operators and their relation to the Hamiltonian.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and questioning each other's reasoning. Some have offered clarifications regarding the role of constants and the implications of the operators' forms on the ground state of the system.

Contextual Notes

There are ongoing debates about the importance of certain aspects of the problem versus others, particularly regarding the normalization constants and their impact on the understanding of the operators.

nklohit
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Why must the ladder operators be
\sqrt{\dfrac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}(x+\dfrac{ip}{m\omega}) and
\sqrt{\dfrac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}(x-\dfrac{ip}{m\omega})?
What is the method that obtain them from Schrödinger Equation?
And why we know that they are creation and anihilation operator?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe this can be useful:

http://www.oru.se/oru-upload/Institutioner/Naturvetenskap/Dokument/Fysik/PJ/Kvantmekanik/stegop.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
nklohit said:
Why must the ladder operators be
\sqrt{\dfrac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}(x+\dfrac{ip}{m\omega}) and
\sqrt{\dfrac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}(x-\dfrac{ip}{m\omega})?
What is the method that obtain them from Schrödinger Equation?
And why we know that they are creation and anihilation operator?

Don't worry about all the constants out front, they don't really matter too much, since they are just a convenient normalization.

The important point is that one of those operators you wrote down gives zero when it acts on a Gaussian (which is the ground state of the simple harmonic oscillator). That operator is that "annihilation operator" or "lowering operator."

The other operator is the annihilation operator's Hermitian conjugate and is called the "creation operator" or "raising operator."
 
olgranpappy said:
Don't worry about all the constants out front, they don't really matter too much, since they are just a convenient normalization.

why would you say that? they follow from the true hamiltonian
 
quetzalcoatl9 said:
why would you say that?

I said that because I believe it is important to realize the difference between important aspects of this problem and trivial aspects or this problem.

Of course, in the end, you want to get the trivial aspects correct as well.

Perhaps what I should have said was: "chose your units in such a way that you can set all the messy crap out front equal to one." Or, better yet, choose your units such that the unit of mass is m and the unit of time is 1/\omega and the unit of angular momentum is 2\hbar, in which case:

<br /> a=x+\frac{d}{dx}<br />

and
<br /> a^{\dagger}= x - \frac{d}{dx}<br />

and the ground state is
<br /> \psi_0(x)=\sqrt{\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi}}}e^{-x^2/2}<br />

My point was that one of those operators has a relative minus sign which is important because that one doesn't annihilate the ground state and the other has a relative plus sign which then does annihilate the ground state.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K