Why Must the Angle γ Be Greater Than 90° in Engineering Statics?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the angle γ in engineering statics, specifically addressing why γ must be greater than 90° and the implications of this condition. Participants explore the geometric and trigonometric relationships involved in the problem, including projections and component calculations related to forces in a triangle. The scope includes conceptual clarifications and technical reasoning related to the problem-solving process.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question why γ must be greater than 90° and under what circumstances it could be smaller, indicating a need for clarification on the measurement of γ.
  • There is confusion regarding the calculation of projections and components, with some participants suggesting different approaches to finding the x and y components of the forces involved.
  • One participant notes that γ is measured from the z-axis to force F2, which is positioned below the xy-plane, raising questions about the implications for the angle's size.
  • Another participant points out that if F2 were in the xy-plane, γ would equal 90°, and they inquire about the relationship between the position of F2 and the value of γ.
  • Some participants discuss the trigonometric functions involved in the calculations, with references to the cosine and sine of various angles, and the need to correctly identify adjacent and opposite sides in the context of the triangles being analyzed.
  • There is a debate about whether γ could exceed 180°, with some participants asserting that it cannot, while others express uncertainty about the relationship between the angle and the quadrants in which F2 lies.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the necessity for γ to be greater than 90°, and multiple competing views regarding the calculations and interpretations of angles remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion over the definitions and relationships between angles and components, indicating potential limitations in their understanding of the geometric configurations involved. There are also unresolved questions about the correct application of trigonometric functions in the context of the problem.

Mdhiggenz
Messages
324
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Hello everyone,

I have a few questions regarding the problem below.

1. I did the process for solving γ correct however I took the 60° angle instead of the 120° angle. The below solution states that γ>90°. Why must is be greater, than 90°, and when would it have been smaller?

2. I got a big confused when solving for the projected portion of the triangle. What I did initially was solve for the hypotenuse of the projection which I thought would be

F'=450sin(45°), and just use that F' to find the x, and y components, however that was completely wrong it seems.


2cgboy0.png




Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mdhiggenz said:

Homework Statement


Hello everyone,

I have a few questions regarding the problem below.

1. I did the process for solving γ correct however I took the 60° angle instead of the 120° angle. The below solution states that γ>90°. Why must is be greater, than 90°, and when would it have been smaller?
Where is γ measured from?
If F2 pointing above pr below the x-y plane?

2. I got a big confused when solving for the projected portion of the triangle. What I did initially was solve for the hypotenuse of the projection which I thought would be

F'=450sin(45°), and just use that F' to find the x, and y components, however that was completely wrong it seems.
F1 forms the hypotenuse of a 45deg triangle, Is this the one you mean?

The x-y projection would start with what you did[*]: F'=F1/√2
How did you get the x and y components from there?

Note: the angles are very friendly.
i.e. sin(45)=cos(45)=1/√2, sin(30)=cos(30)=1/2, etc.

-------------------------

[*] except it's the cosine - doesn't matter to the result though.
Does matter for the next results.
 
Last edited:
γ is measured from the z axis to F2. It seems that F2 is below the xy plane. For the projection what I mean was for the 30degree the way my mind analyzes it is that we get the x components of both triangles e.g 30 and 45 degree.

Which would mean that 450*cos(45) would be the x component for the 45 degree right triangle, and cos(30) would be for the 30 degree triangle.

Which would make the i comonent. 450*cos(45)cos(30), however the solution above has it as 450*cos(45) sin(30)
 
Mdhiggenz said:
γ is measured from the z axis to F2. It seems that F2 is below the xy plane.
... and? Relate this answer back to your question:
The below solution states that γ>90°. Why must is be greater, than 90°, and when would it have been smaller?

What does your answer mean for the size of γ?
If F2 were exactly in the x-y plane, what would γ equal?
Since it is below the x-y plane, would γ be bigger or smaller than this value?



For the projection what I mean was for the 30degree the way my mind analyzes it is that we get the x components of both triangles e.g 30 and 45 degree.

Which would mean that 450*cos(45) would be the x component for the 45 degree right triangle, and cos(30) would be for the 30 degree triangle.

Which would make the i comonent. 450*cos(45)cos(30), however the solution above has it as 450*cos(45) sin(30)

Looks like you got the sines and cosines mixed up.
You got it right for if the 30deg angle was measured from the +x axis like normal - but it isn't.
It can help if you sketch the triangle out separately and label the sides before working out which is the adjacent and which the opposite sides.
 
Oh because since it is below the xy plane that would mean it would be in either quadrants 3 or 4, but would that mean it should be γ>180 not 90?. I do understand though that the max a triangle can be is 180 I just don't understand that relation.

For the projection of the 30 degree triangle I now see that it is on the yz plane. But still don't see how that would help me. Even if I labeled the sides, for example I know that cos(30) would be on the y-axis now. But I can't see how that is in any way related to the X axis.
 
Mdhiggenz said:
Oh because since it is below the xy plane that would mean it would be in either quadrants 3 or 4, but would that mean it should be γ>180 not 90?. I do understand though that the max a triangle can be is 180 I just don't understand that relation.
Careful: ##\gamma## cannot be bigger than 180deg.

What is the angle between the z-axis and anywhere on the x-y plane?

For the projection of the 30 degree triangle I now see that it is on the yz plane.
It isn't. But the angle is to the y-axis in the x-y plane. The formula ##x=r\cos\theta## only works for when ##\theta## is measured from the x axis.

But still don't see how that would help me. Even if I labeled the sides, for example I know that cos(30) would be on the y-axis now. But I can't see how that is in any way related to the X axis.
If ##\cos(30)## is on the y axis, then what is the trig function that would be on the x axis?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K