Why must the second term on the right-hand side vanish in string theory?

StenEdeback
Messages
65
Reaction score
38
Homework Statement
There is one statement in the text of the attached picture that I do not understand
Relevant Equations
See text below
I am doing private studies in string theory and am reading "A first course in string theory" by Barton Zwiebach. Below equation 6.52 the author
says "Since the second term on the right-hand side must vanish...". I do not understand why this term must vanish, and I would be grateful for an explanation.

Sten Edebäck

IMG_0026.PNG
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first term on the RHS should vanish because of the choice that boundary values of integration vanish, and the second term on the RHS is zero follows from this and ##\delta S=0##.
 
  • Like
Likes StenEdeback
Thank you! A good explanation! Physics Forums is indeed a valuable last resort for me doing private studies, when I cannot find the answers to my questions by googling. Physics Forums is the equivalent of a supporting professor to me. And I feel a true joy when I overcome a hurdle and can go on with my studies. Theoretical Physics is really fun!
 
  • Like
Likes Hamiltonian, Amrator, pinball1970 and 4 others
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top