Why NCl3 is dipole-dipole in intermolecular force?

  • Thread starter terryds
  • Start date

Answers and Replies

  • #2
34,800
10,963
3.0 is a rounded value, they are not exactly the same. The small difference is still more important than the weaker van-der-Waals forces.
This post suggests a notable difference between the electronegativity.
 
  • #3
392
13
3.0 is a rounded value, they are not exactly the same. The small difference is still more important than the weaker van-der-Waals forces.
This post suggests a notable difference between the electronegativity.
But, according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_polarity ,
  • Polar bonds occur when the difference in electronegativity between the two atoms is between 0.4 and 1.7
In that post you suggested, the electronegativity difference is just 0.2 , still not enough to perform a polar bond..
 
  • #4
34,800
10,963
There is no sharp line dividing polar and nonpolar. Some bonds are more polar than others.
In the same way, there is no sharp line dividing polar and ionic bonds.
 
  • #5
392
13
There is no sharp line dividing polar and nonpolar. Some bonds are more polar than others.
In the same way, there is no sharp line dividing polar and ionic bonds.
If there is no sharp line dividing polar and non-polar, how to determine if such bond is polar?
By memorizing only??
 
  • #6
DrDu
Science Advisor
6,062
775
I don't see no reason why NCl3, even with perfectly covalent bonds, should not have a permanent dipole moment (which we know from experimental measurements to be 0.6 D). It is a question of the asymmetry of the electronic charge distribution around the nuclei. The lone pair on N is especially important in this respect.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
34,800
10,963
If there is no sharp line dividing polar and non-polar, how to determine if such bond is polar?
By memorizing only??
Every bond between atoms of different types is a bit polar. You can set an arbitrary threshold for saying "this is sufficient to call it polar", which can be convenient sometimes, but you do not have to.
 

Related Threads on Why NCl3 is dipole-dipole in intermolecular force?

  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
7K
Top