Why negative Rockwell Hardness value is considered as "no good"?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Negative Rockwell hardness values are not utilized due to the potential for confusion and misinterpretation. The Rockwell hardness test employs specific constants, with N values of 130 for the C scale and 100 for the B scale, where s is consistently 0.002. A negative value indicates an indentation depth exceeding 0.26mm for the C scale, which is not meaningful in practical applications. The convention against negative values is reinforced by the limitations of the indenter's travel and the need for accurate hardness measurements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Rockwell hardness testing methodology
  • Familiarity with hardness scales, specifically Rockwell B and C scales
  • Knowledge of indentation depth measurement in material testing
  • Awareness of the significance of N values in Rockwell hardness calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences between Rockwell B and C scales in detail
  • Explore the significance of indentation depth in hardness testing
  • Learn about alternative hardness testing methods for soft materials
  • Investigate the implications of indenter configuration on hardness measurements
USEFUL FOR

Material scientists, quality control engineers, and anyone involved in hardness testing and material characterization will benefit from this discussion.

null void
Messages
102
Reaction score
1
I have read some pdf files and it says negative Rockwell hardness value is not used because of it would cause confusion.

What I currently know is :

HR(C/B) = N - h/s;

for C scale, N = 130; while for B scale N = 100;
s always = 0.002

and h is the permanent depth of the indentation.

I think these 2 addition question might related to the reason for not using negative value:

i) negative value means the indentation is like the indentation exceed 0.26mm for C scale,
0 > (130 - h/0.002); h bust be at lease 0.26mm, does this 0.26mm means anything significant?

ii) And i also read that 130 in C scale is the indicate infinite hardness, any simple way to explain why it is 130?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I don't know about (i), but for (ii), a value of 130 means h=0, no indentation at all.
 
Thanks for your reply. Is that 130 is determined through experimenting the indentation on materials? Probably they can't get a that kind of condition to happen i guess they extrapolate the graph to 0 indentation.

Do you know the N value for other scale?

I also find that I never see negative value on the Rockwell scale, is this the reason they don't use negative value in convention?
 
Last edited:
null void said:
Thanks for your reply. Is that 130 is determined through experimenting the indentation on materials? Probably they can't get a that kind of condition to happen i guess they extrapolate the graph to 0 indentation.
It is an arbitrary value to put the hardness values in a convenient range.

I also find that I never see negative value on the Rockwell scale, is this the reason they don't use negative value in convention?
Very soft materials could have that, but I guess then you should use a different scale.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Generally, the indenter has limited travel. At .26 travel the C scale value would be zero. Similarly, a B scale indenter would bottom out at .20 travel. The indenter itself is also different. For B scale measurements, a ball bearing is normally used. For C scale measurements a conical diamond is usually the indenter. The indenter configuration varies according to the material and test type. For surface specific hardness, like case hardening, you don't want the indenter to penetrate deeper than the zone of interest, which may only be in the thousandths. If the indenter bottoms out, or you get something silly like negative hardness, you are doing the wrong test.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Yeah right, the measurement become error when they penetrated too deep, thanks guys for clearing my confusion up
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
12K
  • · Replies 96 ·
4
Replies
96
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
3K