Why no general solution to quintic equations?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the absence of a general solution for quintic equations, as established by the Abel–Ruffini theorem. This theorem asserts that no general solution exists for fifth-degree polynomials using only basic arithmetic operations and nth roots. While quintic equations can be expressed analytically using Jacobi theta functions, they cannot be solved with a finite number of elementary functions. Understanding the proof requires knowledge of abstract algebra, particularly Galois theory, as detailed in Pinter's "A Book of Abstract Algebra."

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Abel–Ruffini theorem
  • Familiarity with quintic equations and polynomial functions
  • Knowledge of Galois theory
  • Basic concepts of abstract algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Abel–Ruffini theorem in detail
  • Learn about Jacobi theta functions and their applications
  • Read Pinter's "A Book of Abstract Algebra" focusing on Galois theory
  • Explore alternative proofs of the quintic equation's unsolvability
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of abstract algebra, and anyone interested in the theoretical foundations of polynomial equations and their solvability.

Superhoben
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
It seems odd to me that we have no general solution to quintic equations yet.
Is it possible that it exist any general solutions to equations of the fifth degree (and higher) that just haven't been discovered yet?
Or are we certain that it doesn't exist?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is in fact a theorem that no solution exists that only uses functions that we would consider typical.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abel–Ruffini_theorem

The theorem says that you cannot solve the general fifth degree polynomial using only basic arithmetic operations and calculating nth roots of numbers. It might be that there are other functions which you can allow yourself to use to solve higher degree polynomials (a trivial example is that if you define a function P(a,b,c,d,e) to return a root for a polynomial whose coefficients are a,b,c,d and e then you have "solved" the polynomial).
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks. I don't understand why it don't exist yet and I don't understand the proof completely. Just out of curiosity, how much math do you need to read to understand the proof?
 
Superhoben said:
Thanks. I don't understand why it don't exist yet
It exists yet: The roots of the quintic equation can be analytically expressed thanks to the Jacobi theta functions, but not with a finie number of elementary functions.
 
Superhoben said:
Thanks. I don't understand why it don't exist yet and I don't understand the proof completely. Just out of curiosity, how much math do you need to read to understand the proof?
A fairly large portion of a typical undergraduate course in abstract algebra. For example, the proof using Galois theory is given in the final chapter (33) of Pinter's A Book of Abstract Algebra, and it depends to some degree on almost all of the first 32 chapters.

There are more direct proofs that do not use Galois theory - indeed, Abel's original proof predated Galois theory. Here is a video which sketches one such proof:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
There's all sorts of unsolved and insoluble problems in mathematics. It's not like walking into a restaurant and ordering a meal.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K