Why point particle interaction has UV divergence,but string interaction does not?

Click For Summary
Point particle interactions in quantum field theory (QFT) exhibit ultraviolet (UV) divergences due to the need for momentum integration over all possible values, leading to infinities. In contrast, string theory avoids these divergences by integrating over the moduli space of Riemann surfaces, which introduces a different framework that does not rely on naive momentum cutoffs. This integration is more complex and incorporates concepts like modular invariance, distinguishing string theory from traditional particle theories. However, the discussion raises concerns about D0-branes, which are pointlike and may reintroduce short-distance divergences, particularly when considering open strings between them. Ultimately, string theory's structure allows it to handle UV divergences in ways that QFT cannot.
ndung200790
Messages
519
Reaction score
0
Please teach me this:
Why point particle interaction(QTF theory) has UV divergences,but string interaction does not have UV divergences.Because I think that calculating the probability amplitude of a process,we must sum(or integrate) over all possible value of momentum.So how we avoid the UV divergence?
Thank you very much in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ndung200790 said:
Because I think that calculating the probability amplitude of a process,we must sum(or integrate) over all possible value of momentum

That is true in particle QFT, but not in string theory. What replaces momentum integration is an integration over the moduli space ("shapes") of Riemann surfaces, and this is substantially different to particle theory. One may loosely say there appears a UV cutoff for the momentum integration. Actually things are more complicated and the stringy way of integration is more than a cutoff, and thus cannot be expressed in terms of particle QFT supplemented by a naive momentum cutoff. Pertaining to the geometry of Riemann surfaces, there are notions like modular invariance which have no analog in particle physics, so string theory is "more" than just a collection of infinitely many particle theories. That's why it can do things that cannot be achieved in particle QFT.
 
One thing I have always wondered in this context is what happens when one talks about the scattering of D0-branes, which are pointlike objects. In that case, no smearing out of the interaction vertices occurs, as it does for extended objects like strings. So doesn't this bring short-distance divergences back into the game?
 
Orbb said:
One thing I have always wondered in this context is what happens when one talks about the scattering of D0-branes, which are pointlike objects. In that case, no smearing out of the interaction vertices occurs, as it does for extended objects like strings. So doesn't this bring short-distance divergences back into the game?

Yes, from open strings stretched between the branes, which become massless when the branes coincide. So in a sense these are on-shell divergences.
 
"Supernovae evidence for foundational change to cosmological models" https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.15143 The paper claims: We compare the standard homogeneous cosmological model, i.e., spatially flat ΛCDM, and the timescape cosmology which invokes backreaction of inhomogeneities. Timescape, while statistically homogeneous and isotropic, departs from average Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker evolution, and replaces dark energy by kinetic gravitational energy and its gradients, in explaining...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
763
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K