- #1

- 27

- 0

- Thread starter snackster17
- Start date

- #1

- 27

- 0

- #2

- 901

- 2

This is from Polchinski's book stating the attributes of having a Superstring Theory to having a point particle Quantum Field Theory - SU(3)xSU(2)xU(1) which doesn't include gravity:

"1.*Gravity*. Every consistent String Theory must contain a masless spin-2 [vibrational] state, whose interactions reduce at low energy to general relativity.

2.*A consistent theory of quantum gravity, at least in perturbation theory.* As we have noted, this is in contrast to all known quantum *field* theories of gravity.

3.*Grand unification*. String theories lead to gauge groups large enough to include the Standard Model. Some of the simplest string theories lead to the same gauge groups an fermion representations that arise in the unification of the Standard Model.

4.*Extra dimensions.* String theory requires a definite number of space-time dimensions, ten [or 11 in M-Theory]. The field equations have solutions with four large flat and six small curved dimensions, with four dimensional physics that resembles the Standard Model.

5.*Supersymmetry*. Consistent String Theories require space-time supersymmetry, as either a manifest or a spontaneously broken symmetry

6.*Chiral gauge couplings*. The gauge interactions in nature are parity asymmetric (chiral). This has been a stumbling block for a number of previous unifying ideas: they required parity symmetric gauge couplings. String theory allows chiral gauge couplings.

7.*No free parameters*. String theory has no adjustable constants.

8.*Uniqueness*. Not only are there no continuous parameters, but there is no discrete freedom analogous to the choice of gauge group and representations in field theory: there is a unique string theory." - *(String Theory, Volume 1: An Introduction to Bosonic String, Polchinski)*

Hope this helps, Kevin

"1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

Hope this helps, Kevin

Last edited:

- #3

atyy

Science Advisor

- 14,003

- 2,283

The main difficulty with using point particles (ie. quantum field theory) to describe gravity is that it perturbatively nonrenormalizable.

There is some chance that a quantum field theory of gravity might be nonperturbatively renormalizable, in which case one could potentially use point particles to describe gravity. This line of research is called Asymptotic Safety.

Whether Asymptotic Safety can work is unknown, and the perturbative nonrenormalizability of gravity suggests that gravity is not a fundamental field, but is made up of more fundamental things. There is a theorem by Weinberg and Witten stating that if gravity is made up of more fundamental things, these things cannot be special relativistic quantum field theories in 4 dimensions.

The idea that gravity is made of strings evades the Weinberg-Witten theorem, as does the idea that gravity is made of a relativistic quantum field theory in 3D. Amazingly, there is much evidence to support the idea that some 10D string theories are relativistic quantum field theories (ie. point particles) in a lower dimension (4D)! This is called AdS/CFT or gauge/gravity duality.

There is some chance that a quantum field theory of gravity might be nonperturbatively renormalizable, in which case one could potentially use point particles to describe gravity. This line of research is called Asymptotic Safety.

Whether Asymptotic Safety can work is unknown, and the perturbative nonrenormalizability of gravity suggests that gravity is not a fundamental field, but is made up of more fundamental things. There is a theorem by Weinberg and Witten stating that if gravity is made up of more fundamental things, these things cannot be special relativistic quantum field theories in 4 dimensions.

The idea that gravity is made of strings evades the Weinberg-Witten theorem, as does the idea that gravity is made of a relativistic quantum field theory in 3D. Amazingly, there is much evidence to support the idea that some 10D string theories are relativistic quantum field theories (ie. point particles) in a lower dimension (4D)! This is called AdS/CFT or gauge/gravity duality.

Last edited:

- #4

- 27

- 0

Do strings and point particles have any attributes such as spin and charge such as other particles? I once read that point particles appear and disappear instantly which makes me think that there formulation was more of a mathematical concept than a actual physical process.

Thats pretty crazy 10 dimensional strings effecting gravity. Can i have a link if possible? Once again thanks for the replies

- #5

- 901

- 2

- #6

- 6,723

- 423

It's not just that string theory makes predictions, but those predictions can't be tested; the theory is not yet able to make predictions at all.String theory seems to work well but its not accepted because its impossible to test, correct?

- #7

atyy

Science Advisor

- 14,003

- 2,283

http://arxiv.org/abs/0908.0333Thats pretty crazy 10 dimensional strings effecting gravity. Can i have a link if possible? Once again thanks for the replies

http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0207142

http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/spheno10/

- #8

- 27

- 0

- #9

- 901

- 2

The strings are the particles, for instance if you had a string that was one centimeter in circumference, up close it would appear to be topologically the same as a circle. Now if you move backward by 100 meters the string is topologically the same as the point. Essentially strings are so small that the current energies or distances we can see with the LHC isn't small enough to distinguish them from points.

Last edited:

- #10

- 27

- 0

- #11

- 901

- 2

- Last Post

- Replies
- 25

- Views
- 6K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 6K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 4K

- Replies
- 20

- Views
- 4K

- Replies
- 20

- Views
- 4K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 890

- Replies
- 12

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 4K

- Replies
- 19

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 5K