Why support for diving board case is assume as pin/roll?

  • Thread starter Thread starter enotyphoon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Board Support
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the modeling of a diving board's support system, specifically questioning why it is treated as a pin support rather than a fixed support. Participants clarify that while the diving board is bolted to the base, allowing for some resistance to rotation, it is still modeled as a pin to simplify calculations of reaction forces and spring compression. The consensus is that for educational purposes, particularly for high school students, modeling the board as a pin support is more appropriate until they learn about beam deflection, at which point a rigid attachment can be considered.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic structural mechanics
  • Familiarity with beam deflection concepts
  • Knowledge of support types in engineering (pin vs. fixed)
  • Experience with calculating reaction forces in static systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of beam deflection in structural engineering
  • Learn about different types of support reactions (pin, fixed, roller)
  • Explore modeling techniques for rigid bodies in engineering simulations
  • Investigate the use of fasteners and their impact on structural integrity
USEFUL FOR

Engineering students, structural analysts, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone involved in the design and analysis of support systems in structures.

enotyphoon
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Sorry for silly question, but have been wondering.
Diving board it is bolted to the ground(base platform) (vertically), why not assume it as fix. the way bolt is secured is same direction as the load, hence it is not easy/resist to rotate up and down like pin or hinge. so there is moment. Isn't?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Are you comparing a hypothetical diving board with a real one? I can't really follow your question. Try explaining what is confusing you more fully.
 
Capture.png

http://[url=http://postimg.org/image/fqof29xxj/][PLAIN]http://s15.postimg.org/fqof29xxj/Capture.jpg I'm pretty sure the end of beam(bolted) will be considered as pin(from many example I have seen).
however 2 bolts is bolted vertically (not sideway like huge pin), that mean it the beam to go up and down as pin. So shouldn't it be fix?

EDIT: Pics source from google
 
Last edited by a moderator:
From your second picture, it is certainly bolted to something. Is that part rigidly attached to the base?
 
I would say it is just bolted by two fastener to base, and assuming the body is rigid when try to find the reaction force.
 
One of the pictures you have didn't come through properly. Did it also have springs?
 
Nevermind, ignore the picture that didn't come through properly. Only 1 pics.
 
So. If I wanted to make a homework problem for high school students, or anyone who hasn't learned about beam deflection, I would model it with a pin. They could calculate reaction forces and maybe spring compression, all while assuming the beam was a rigid body.
After learning about beam deflection, I would model it rigidly attached.
Who is the intended audience for the model that confused you?
 
yes to find reaction force, we would assume the beam is rigid at first.
However my work colleague ask me why we would use pin support and not fixed support at the end of beam? Because from the pics, the bolt prevent the beam from rotate(unlike pin which easy to rotate) which would match with the characteristic of fix support. so that is the thing that I need to justify.
 
  • #10
What is the context? Who are you modeling this for?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
35K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
10K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
3K