Why the reflection and transmission?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the mathematical foundations of reflection and transmission probabilities in quantum mechanics, specifically in the context of the time-dependent Schrödinger's equation for a delta potential. It highlights the derivation of non-normalizable solutions and the importance of boundary conditions in determining reflection and transmission coefficients. The integral limit as time approaches infinity is emphasized as a method to ascertain the reflection coefficient, while the conversation also touches on the need for rigorous mathematical proofs using epsilon-delta arguments.

PREREQUISITES
  • Time-dependent Schrödinger's equation
  • Delta potential in quantum mechanics
  • Probability current in quantum mechanics
  • Epsilon-delta proofs in mathematical analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of non-normalizable solutions in quantum mechanics
  • Explore boundary conditions and their impact on wave function behavior
  • Investigate the mathematical rigor behind probability currents
  • Learn about wave packet formulations and their implications in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and students of quantum mechanics seeking to deepen their understanding of reflection and transmission phenomena in quantum systems.

tim_lou
Messages
682
Reaction score
1
in solving the time-dependent Schrödinger's equation for the delta potential, one obtain a set of non-normalizable solutions.

form the boundary condition and comparing the coefficients of the solution, one obtains the probability of transmission and reflection.

However, how can one be sure that such events occur in a mathematical standpoint? suppose one has a wave traveling from -infinity (a time-dependent localized wave packet that solves the time-dependent Schrödinger's equation), how does one prove that after a very long time (as time approaches infinity),

the integral:
\lim_{t\rightarrow +\infty}\int_{-\infty}^0\left|\Psi(x,t)\right|^2dx

is the reflection coefficient?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hmmm, I think I see it now, the probability current can give me some hand waving argument to this...

But is there a more rigorous way (mathematically), perhaps something involving the general form of a wave packet?
 
For a physicist, the probability that a particle moving to the right has not passed go in an infinite time defines R. A mathemetician would need an existence proof using epsilon and delta.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K