Why there is 2[itex]\pi[/itex] in every dirac delta function

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the presence of the factor of 2π in Dirac delta functions within the context of quantum field theory (QFT). Participants explore the origins and conventions surrounding this factor, particularly in relation to integrals and Fourier transforms.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that in QFT, Dirac delta functions are often accompanied by 2π, questioning whether this is a convention and seeking its origin.
  • Another participant references a Wikipedia article, suggesting that the 2π factor is related to Euler's formula, e^i2π = -1.
  • A different participant explains that the placement of 2π factors is a convention in quantum mechanics and QFT, particularly in the high-energy physics (HEP) community, where it is common to include these factors in momentum-space integrals.
  • This participant provides a specific example involving Green's functions and the west-coast metric convention, highlighting the normalization of commutation relations for creation and annihilation operators.
  • Another participant offers a representation of the delta function, indicating that the absence of a 1/(2π) factor in an integral leads to the appearance of a 2π in the delta function.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the origin and significance of the 2π factor, indicating that multiple competing explanations exist without a clear consensus on which is definitive.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various conventions in the literature, suggesting that the understanding of the 2π factor may depend on specific definitions and contexts within quantum field theory.

nadia8999
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
in QF, every dirac delta function is accompanied by [itex]2\pi[/itex],i.e.[itex](2\pi)\delta(p-p_0)[/itex] or [itex](2\pi)^3\delta(\vec{p}-\vec{p_0})[/itex]

the intergral element in QF is [itex]\int\frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^3}\frac{1}{2E_P}[/itex], it comes from the integral element [itex]\int\frac{d^4p}{(2\pi)^4}(2\pi)\delta(p^2-m^2)[/itex],I want to know why there is [itex]2\pi[/itex]in the second equation. Is it a convention? Is so where does the [itex]2\pi[/itex]comes from originally.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a convention, where you shift all the [itex]2 \pi[/itex] factors around in quantum mechanics or quantum field theory and where to put the - sign in the exponential. In the HEP community the most common convention is to put all the [itex]2\pi[/itex]'s to the momentum-space integrals, i.e., you define Green's functions etc. as

[tex]G(x)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^4} \frac{\mathrm{d}^4 p}{(2 \pi)^4} \tilde{G}(p) \exp(-\mathrm{i} p \cdot x),[/tex]

where I used the west-coast-metric convention, i.e.,

[tex]p \cdot x=p_{\mu} x^{\mu}=p^0 x^0-\vec{p} \cdot \vec{x}.[/tex]

Thus, the inverse reads

[tex]\tilde{G}(p)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^4} \mathrm{d}^4 x G(x) \exp(+\mathrm{i} p \cdot x).[/tex]

The only exception are the field operators themselves. Their Fourier representation in terms of creation and annihilation operators read (here for the scalar Klein-Gordon field)

[tex]\hat{\phi}(x)=\int_{\mathrm{R}^3} \frac{\mathrm{d}^3 \vec{p}}{\sqrt{(2 \pi)^3 2 E_{\vec{p}}}} \left [\hat{a}(\vec{p}) \exp(-\mathrm{i} p \cdot x) + \hat{b}^{\dagger}(\vec{p}) \exp(+\mathrm{i} p \cdot x) \right]_{p^0=E_{\vec{p}}},[/tex]

with [itex]E_{\vec{p}}=\sqrt{m^2+\vec{p}^2}[/itex].

The reason for this is to get simply normalized commutation relations for the creation and annihilation ops, e.g.,

[tex][\hat{a}(\vec{p}),\hat{a}^{\dagger}(\vec{p}')]=\delta^{(3)}(\vec{p}-\vec{p}').[/tex]

But for this latter issue you have nearly as many conventions as textbooks :-(.
 
One representation of the delta function is
[tex]\delta(x)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int dk e^{ikx}.[/tex]
If the integral appears in some equation without the [tex]\frac{1}{2\pi}[/tex],
you get [tex]2\pi\delta[/tex].
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K