Obtaining the Dirac function from field operator commutation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on obtaining the Dirac function from the commutation relations of field operators in Quantum Field Theory (QFT), specifically using the notation from Otto Nachtman's "Elementary Particle Physics." Participants clarify that the canonical field momentum is derived from the Lagrangian of the free uncharged Klein-Gordon field, leading to the equal-time commutation relation between the field operator and its canonical momentum. The mode decomposition of the field operator is essential for understanding this relationship, which involves annihilation and creation operators. The discussion emphasizes the importance of canonical quantization in establishing these commutation relations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Field Theory (QFT) principles
  • Familiarity with the Klein-Gordon equation and its Lagrangian formulation
  • Knowledge of canonical quantization and commutation relations
  • Basic grasp of Fourier transforms and mode expansions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the equal-time commutation relations in QFT
  • Explore the role of annihilation and creation operators in field theory
  • Learn about the canonical quantization process in Quantum Mechanics
  • Investigate the implications of the uncertainty principle in quantum field theory
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in Quantum Field Theory, particularly those studying the Klein-Gordon field and its applications in particle physics. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of field operator commutation relations and their derivations.

abivz
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Need help obtaining the Dirac function from the commutation of two field operators
Hi everyone, I'm new to PF and this is my second post, I'm taking a QFT course this semester and my teacher asked us to obtain:
$$[\Phi(x,t), \dot{\Phi}(y,t) = iZ\delta^3(x-y)]$$
We're using the Otto Nachtman: Elementary Particle Physics but I've seen other books use this notation:
$$[\Phi(x,t), {\Pi}(y,t) = iZ\delta^3(x-y)]$$
In the book they give:
$$[\Phi(x,t)] = \int\frac{d^3k}{(2\pi)^3}\frac{1}{2\omega}e^{-ikx}(e^{i\omega t}a^{\dagger}(k)+e^{-iwt}a(-k))$$
$$[\dot\Phi(x,t)] = \int\frac{d^3k}{(2\pi)^3}\frac{i}{2}e^{-ikx}(e^{i\omega t}a^{\dagger}(k)-e^{-iwt}a(-k))$$

I'm confused as to how one can obtain this form from those definitions, specially because of the annihilation and creation operators, I haven't found a book that explains it, they just give the equation, does anyone have any tips on how to start or have any book or lecture notes that could help? Thanks in advance :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a continuum approximation .The roots for this notion comes from the uncertainty principle where you cannot make explicit shape peaked statements about the position and momentum at the same time.So here you want to reconstruct a wavefuntion with position dependency to field formalism in such a manner that quantum mechanics and special relativity collaborate.So have to act in the momentum space to get sharp peaked position statements .This is the so called mode expansion,which involved the fouriertransform concepts but uses also the fact that the incoming plane waves anhilates and the outgoing plane waves creates particles.the whole new theory should be canonical,which means that the field operators should fulfill the canonical commutation relations.
Maybe you can check

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_quantization

(In the field operator section) to get a better intuition /felling for this problem.

troglodyte
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: abivz
I'm not sure, whether I understand the question right. First of all from the Lagrangian for the free uncharged Klein-Gordon field
$$\mathcal{L}=\frac{1}{2} (\partial_{\mu} \Phi)(\partial^{\mu} \Phi) - \frac{m}{2} \Phi^2,$$
you get the canonical field momenta as
$$\Pi=\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \dot{\Phi}}=\dot{\Phi}.$$
Then the equation of motion gives you the mode decomposition you wrote above. The time derivative of the field is easy: you just differentiate the exponential functions in the mode decomposition.

Then you can derive the equal-time commutation relation between the field operator and the canonical-field-momentum operator using the commutation relations for the annihilation and creation operators.

Usually the argument is in the other direction, because the equal-time commutation relations between field and canonical-momentum operator are usually conjectured in what's known as "canonical quantization".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: troglodyte

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K