The discussion centers around the non-functionality of the website http://optionalreaction.com/articles/ghd/index.htm, which presents questionable claims regarding physics, specifically the relationship between force and acceleration. Participants express skepticism about the validity of the site's content, with one user referencing the fundamental physics equation f=ma and criticizing the site's claims as nonsensical. The conversation highlights a lack of serious engagement from the engineering community due to the perceived absurdity of the claims made on the website.
PREREQUISITESThis discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the fundamentals of motion and energy, as well as those evaluating the credibility of scientific claims online.
This discovery has been made available to the universe in the hope that it will help ease the pain and suffering of those who are victims of the universe.
Sense of humour. OK, so it's a joke. And you were hoping to dupe others into making serious replies?optionalreaction said:I guess you guys have no sense of humour here?
Just in case you're serious, do the math. Its pretty straightforward that if f=ma then ma=f. You flipped an equation over and somehow got a different answer doing it one way than the other way!optionalreaction said:Hi,
Could anyone tell me why http://optionalreaction.com/articles/ghd/index.htm doesn't work?
Many thanks in advance (this problem has been bothering me for a long time),
Keith
That was my favorite part.The release of this information (November 2002) will stop any patents.
Accelerating a ball balanced on a 45 degree slope needs only ~62.5% of the energy needed to directly accelerate a ball of equal mass.