Why use Earth as a gravity assist?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the use of Earth as a gravity assist for missions to Jupiter trojan asteroids, specifically referencing NASA missions like JUNO and Galileo. Earth’s significant mass—ten times that of Mars—and its higher velocity relative to the Sun make it a more effective slingshot target. The mechanics of gravity assists dictate that velocity changes near perihelion are more impactful for increasing aphelion, making Earth a more favorable option despite the potential of Mars. Additionally, the frequency of optimal alignments for a Mars slingshot makes it less practical compared to the more readily accessible Earth.

PREREQUISITES
  • Aerospace engineering principles
  • Understanding of gravity assists and orbital mechanics
  • Familiarity with NASA missions such as JUNO and Galileo
  • Knowledge of celestial body mass and velocity dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanics of gravity assists in orbital maneuvers
  • Study the trajectory planning for NASA missions like JUNO and Galileo
  • Learn about perihelion and aphelion dynamics in spacecraft trajectories
  • Explore the frequency and conditions for optimal planetary alignments for slingshots
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, mission planners, and students studying orbital mechanics will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in gravity assists and trajectory optimization for deep space missions.

JayFlynn
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I am doing research for my aerospace engineering dissertation to plan a mission to a Jupiter trojan asteroid. I was researching the type of outgoing trajectories used in missions such as JUNO, Galileo and Europa and noticed they all use Earth as a gravity assist in getting to deep space. Surely be more efficient and save time if a Mars slingshot was used rather than performing deep space manoeuvres way beyond Mars' orbit just to come back to Earth for a slingshot? Can anyone explain the mechanics of why NASA do it like this?
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipe...x-Juno's_interplanetary_trajectory_en.svg.png
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Earth is 10x more massive than Mars.
 
so why can't you just do a really close slingshot around Mars to make up for it's small mass?
 
With a Mar's flyby you would have to wait until all three bodies were in their proper relative positions to make it work. With an Earth fly-by, only Earth and Jupiter have to have the proper relative positions.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JayFlynn
So, it would be more efficient to do a Mars slingshot but they're aligned so infrequently that it's not worth waiting?
 
JayFlynn said:
So, it would be more efficient to do a Mars slingshot but they're aligned so infrequently that it's not worth waiting?
I wouldn't go that far. There are a lot of factors that going into determining what the optimal flight path is. For example, not only is Earth 10 times more massive than Mars, velocity changes made when the probe is at or near its perihelion are more effective than those made at other points of its orbit if you are trying to increase the aphelion.
 
Janus said:
I wouldn't go that far. There are a lot of factors that going into determining what the optimal flight path is. For example, not only is Earth 10 times more massive than Mars, velocity changes made when the probe is at or near its perihelion are more effective than those made at other points of its orbit if you are trying to increase the aphelion.

Cheers Janus. This is really helpful!
 
The two things affecting the value of a body for a slingshot are its mass and its velocity relative to the central body. Earth is not only more massive than Mars, but it's moving faster as well. Mars is, generally speaking, not a great slingshot target.
 
Earth is also easy to get to. Any object launched from Earth is automatically on an Earth-crossing trajectory. Giving your spacecraft an eccentric solar orbit with an semi-major axis of 1 AU will return you to Earth in 1 year. Only minor deep space burns are required to fine-tune the slingshot.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 86 ·
3
Replies
86
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
5K