Why Use Significant Figures in Calculations?

Click For Summary
Significant figures are essential in calculations to convey the precision of measurements, as demonstrated by the attendance figure of 15,000, which can be interpreted differently based on its significant figures. When represented as 1.5 x 10^4, the attendance implies a range of 14,500 to 15,500, indicating uncertainty in the exact count. Without scientific notation, the number 15,000 could suggest varying levels of precision, making it unclear whether it refers to the nearest thousand or the nearest one. The use of scientific notation clarifies how many digits are significant, thus enhancing the accuracy of the information conveyed. Understanding significant figures is crucial for interpreting data correctly in scientific and mathematical contexts.
temaire
Messages
275
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A newspaper reported an attendance of 15,000. If you assume that this number contains two significant figures, how many people could actually have been at the game?


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm having difficulty answering this problem not because I don't know how to use significant figures, but why we use significant figures. My prof says that since 15000 can be represented as 1.5 x 10^4 the number of people in attendance would range from 1.4 x 10^4 to 1.6 x 10^4. Could someone please explain this to me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If it says 15,000 then rounding off to the nearest 1000 means there was between 14,500 and 15,500.

Using normal numbers eg 15,000 you don't know if they mean 15,000 to the nearest 1000 or the nearest 1, ie 15,000 rather than 15,001
By using scientific notation we can show how many of the 0 are significant.

So 1.5x10^4 (2sig figures) would mean between 1.45x10^4 (14,500) and 1.55x10^4 (15,500) while 1.5000x10^4 (5 sig fig) would mean exactly 15,000
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K