Why Use 'Singular' to Describe Singular Simplex?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter navigator
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the terminology used in mathematics, specifically the use of the term "singular" to describe singular simplices. Participants explore the relationship between singular simplices and concepts such as singular matrices and singular points, examining the implications of these terms within the context of simplicial and singular homology.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the rationale behind using the term "singular" for singular simplices and seeks connections to singular matrices or points.
  • Another participant suggests that the term "singular" may refer to meanings such as "remarkable" or "deviating from the usual," arguing that singular homology deals with continuous images of simplices that can be degenerate and not resemble traditional simplices.
  • A different participant asserts that singular matrices and singular simplices are unrelated, although they propose a hypothetical connection involving degenerate simplices and their Jacobians being singular.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between singular simplices and singular matrices, with some suggesting a conceptual link while others maintain that there is no significant connection. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the appropriateness of the term "singular" in this context.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference definitions of "singular" that may not align with mathematical usage, and there is an acknowledgment of the potential for degenerate cases in singular homology that complicate the discussion.

navigator
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Why do we use the term "singular" to describe singular simplex? Are there any relations between singular matrix (or singular point)and singular simplex?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I ran a google search for singular and found http://www.thefreedictionary.com/singular. Definitions 3 and 4 read

3. Being beyond what is ordinary or usual; remarkable.
4. Deviating from the usual or expected; odd. See Synonyms at strange.

and I believe it is the meaning appropriate for "singular simplex". Indeed, whereas in simplicial homology, the objects of interest are actual simplices (the n-dimensional generalisation of a triangle), in singular homology, the objects of interest are merely continuous images of simplices. In particular, these images may be very degenerate (a point for instance) and not resemble a simplex at all. That is, they may deviate from what is expected of something called a simplex.
 
To answer the other question, singular matrices and singular simplices have nothing to do with each other, unless you really stretch :)

(The big stretch: if you have a degenerate simplex in the top dimension represented by a differentiable map, its Jacobian would be singular)
 
Thank for your replies.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
490
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 167 ·
6
Replies
167
Views
8K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K