- #1

- 10

- 0

I can understand the reason why ∫ψψ*dx < ∞ But do not understand how quadratic integrability implies that.

I would be very thankful to anybody who can give me some idea.

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter relativist
- Start date

- #1

- 10

- 0

I can understand the reason why ∫ψψ*dx < ∞ But do not understand how quadratic integrability implies that.

I would be very thankful to anybody who can give me some idea.

- #2

Fredrik

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 10,872

- 419

- #3

- 10

- 0

Can anybody please answer my question

- #4

Fredrik

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 10,872

- 419

I took a quick look at Griffiths. It's footnote 8 on page 11 in the copy I could get hold of quickly, so maybe the claim is different in your edition. In the text I'm looking at, he's talking about square integrable

- #5

Matterwave

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 3,966

- 327

Physicists are usually sloppy when it comes to math as compared with mathematicians. Suffice it to say that the 1/sqrt(x) rule is at the very least a good rule of thumb for square integrability.

1/x, when integrated over the part of the real line where x>1 (giving you a natural log function) diverges due to it not "decaying fast enough". That's why functions must decay FASTER than 1/x in order that this integral does not diverge. This corresponds to a wave-function which must decay faster than 1/sqrt(x) (since it will be squared).

- #6

- 10

- 0

Physicists are usually sloppy when it comes to math as compared with mathematicians. Suffice it to say that the 1/sqrt(x) rule is at the very least a good rule of thumb for square integrability.

1/x, when integrated over the part of the real line where x>1 (giving you a natural log function) diverges due to it not "decaying fast enough". That's why functions must decay FASTER than 1/x in order that this integral does not diverge. This corresponds to a wave-function which must decay faster than 1/sqrt(x) (since it will be squared).

Thanks for a nice answer. I fact I stumbled upon a problem in chapter 3 (problem 3.2) which got me thinking in the right direction after working on it. Your reply has helped to gain a good deal of confidence that I am making some progress in learning qm.

Thanks again,

Relativist.

Share:

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 31

- Views
- 40K