Why we would 32 in Celsius to Fahrenheit & Vice Versa

  • Thread starter Thread starter HussanAli
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    celsius
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 14K views
HussanAli
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Why we would 32 in Celsius to Fahrenheit & Vice Versa.

Hey fellows, please tell me why we add 32 to celsius to Fahrenheit conversion and vice versa. According to my mind, I derive C to F formula of my own. I do the following.1)I look and choose the same scale of F and C. The most obvious of which is freezing and boiling point. For F (32-212) and for C (0-100).2)Now to derive the formula for C to F, i divided 180/100 =1.8 it means that if celsius then the corresponding F is 1.8. So I now want to know how much is 37C in Fahrenheit then I multiplied it by 1.8*37=66.6 which is not true unless I add 32 to this. But why would I actually do that? Please explain 32 celsius to Fahrenheit.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
on Phys.org


You've correctly figured out the relative scales for F and C temperatures, i.e. the ratio of one degree C to one degree F, but since the two don't both start at the same zero point, you have to add 32 degrees, which is the amount of offset between them. In other words, if they both defined zero degrees to be the freezing point of water, but used their different scales, then you'd be fine, but since the Fahrenheit scale is offset by 32 degrees, you must account for that.

Maybe it would help you to draw a plot of F degrees vs. C degrees. You could have a line parallel line to the F line that went through the origin - that would correspond to what you would get with no offset. But the correct F line is offset by 32.
 
Last edited:
Thanks guy. =)

Formula
(32°C × 9/5) + 32 = 89.6°F
 
Last edited by a moderator: