Why were complex numbers introduced in physics?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Complex numbers were introduced in physics primarily to address limitations of real numbers, particularly in solving equations like x² + 1 = 0, which have no real solutions. In the analysis of AC circuits, complex numbers simplify mathematical operations by allowing the use of phasors, represented as vectors in the complex plane. This approach facilitates easier calculations of voltage, current, and impedance, making it a mathematical convenience rather than a necessity. Complex numbers also find applications beyond AC circuits, including aerodynamics and fluid mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of AC circuit analysis
  • Familiarity with phasors and their representation
  • Basic knowledge of complex numbers and their properties
  • Proficiency in algebraic manipulation of exponential and trigonometric functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the use of phasors in RLC circuit analysis
  • Learn about the mathematical properties of complex numbers
  • Investigate the application of complex numbers in fluid mechanics
  • Study the relationship between complex numbers and sinusoidal functions
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, physicists, and students studying circuit analysis or mathematical modeling in physics will benefit from this discussion on the role of complex numbers in understanding and simplifying AC circuits.

  • #31
To me, it helps that one of the first things one learns in complex analysis is that a complex number is nothing more than an ordered pair (which can also be represented by a + bi). They're just ordered pairs that we know how to do operations with. Or from a physics viewpoint, it's almost like a unit vector that points upwards (with the exception of that little i^2 = -1 thing) if we assume that a number not multiplied by i points horizontally.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Complex numbers weren't invented with any specific application in mind. They were introduced to solve certain equations which had no real solutions. The fact that they are useful in physics was , I reckon, a coincidence. They weren't designed to be that way.
 
  • #33
I recommend a very entertaining book An Imaginary Tale: The Story of i [the square root of minus one] By Paul J. Nahin

The science and math communities resisted the need for complex numbers for centuries. They had the same question as the OP. The book tells the story of how they were eventually persuaded.

Another book, QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter By Richard Feynman explains quantum mechanics using very clever graphics instead of complex numbers. Indeed instead of any number or equations. Studying Feynman's graphics makes it obvious that quantum mechanics can never be correctly described by just real arithmetic. Both the magnitude and phase are mandatory to get the correct answers.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 108 ·
4
Replies
108
Views
11K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K