Why why why (tiny limsup proof)

  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a theorem regarding cluster points and the limits of sequences, specifically stating that if x is a cluster point of the sequence {x_n}, then lim inf(x_n) ≤ x ≤ lim sup(x_n). The author critiques the proof method presented in the book, suggesting a more straightforward approach by defining A as the set of all cluster points, leading to the conclusion that lim inf(x_n) = inf(A) ≤ x ≤ sup(A) = lim sup(x_n). This alternative proof is deemed more concise and direct.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cluster points in real analysis
  • Familiarity with the concepts of lim inf and lim sup
  • Basic knowledge of set theory and infimum/supremum
  • Proficiency in mathematical proof techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definitions and properties of cluster points in real analysis
  • Learn about the formal definitions of lim inf and lim sup
  • Explore set theory concepts, particularly infimum and supremum
  • Review various proof techniques used in mathematical analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in real analysis, particularly those studying limits and convergence of sequences.

quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
There's a "theorem" in my book that says if x is a cluster point of {x_n}, then lim inf(x_n)[itex]\leq[/itex]x[itex]\leq[/itex]lim sup(x_n).

The way the author proves it is a little bit extravagant. Why not just say "Let A be the set of all cluster points. Then, lim inf(x_n)=inf(A)[itex]\leq[/itex]x[itex]\leq[/itex]sup(A)=lim sup(x_n)."

?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't they pretty much say the same thing?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K