- #1

- 248

- 0

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

So even if we were to assume that dark energy is the right answer, there's no guarantee that the theory actually predicts the correct amount.In summary, the expansion of the universe's radius is faster than c, but gravity could eventually slow it down if enough matter was added. However, there is still uncertainty about what the correct answer is for dark energy.f

- #1

- 248

- 0

- #2

Mentor

2022 Award

- 22,645

- 6,859

- #3

Science Advisor

- 6,197

- 446

Expansion isn't a speed, it's a rate. So expansion cannot be faster (or slower) than the speed of light.This is a basic question. If the expansion of the universe's radius is faster than c, and that speed is increasing or staying constant, how would gravity ever slow the expansion down?

Furthermore, the speed of light is only a

Well, if you fill space with a uniform distribution of normal matter, and see what happens given General Relativity (which does fully take into account the finite speed of gravity), you get a universe that necessarily slows down its expansion. If you add radiation, you get a universe whose expansion slows down even more rapidly. To get a universe that speeds up, you need some sort of exotic energy density filling space.Gravitational fields propagate at c, so why would anyone even wonder why it's not slowing down due to gravity (if they thinks gravity effects the "edge" of the universe)?

- #4

- 248

- 0

...which is what our universe is doing, so this is why there must be "dark" energy, correct?To get a universe that speeds up, you need some sort of exotic energy density filling space.

- #5

Science Advisor

- 6,197

- 446

Correct. That or some form of modified gravity. But the theorists are having a very difficult time finding modified gravity theories that both explain the accelerated expansion and also don't clearly contradict solar system experiments.Thanks guys.

...which is what our universe is doing, so this is why there must be "dark" energy, correct?

Dark energy is easy, though: just propose a cosmological constant. It fits all observations, and is only one single parameter in the theory. Plus it's a parameter that is in the theory regardless, because we know of no way for it to be set to zero, so there actually isn't any added complexity to assuming the acceleration is caused by a cosmological constant.

There also turn out to be a number of models from quantum mechanics that mimic a cosmological constant, but they tend to be rather ad-hoc.

Share:

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 813

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 784

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 422

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 759

- Replies
- 0

- Views
- 430

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 940

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 778

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 29

- Views
- 2K