Why would more RAM of same type/speed not work?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TylerH
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ram Work
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the limitations of RAM upgrades in laptops, specifically the Samsung Series 5 NP550P5C-T01US model. The user, Tyler, seeks to replace two 4GB DDR3-PC3 12800 RAM sticks with two 8GB sticks of the same type and speed, but is informed that the laptop's chipset restricts memory to a maximum of 4GB per slot. This limitation is attributed to the motherboard's memory map and chipset architecture, which dictate the maximum RAM capacity and configuration supported.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of DDR3 RAM specifications
  • Familiarity with laptop motherboard architecture
  • Knowledge of chipset memory mapping
  • Basic concepts of logical vs physical addressing
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Samsung Series 5 NP550P5C-T01US RAM specifications
  • Learn about chipset memory limits and configurations
  • Explore the implications of logical vs physical addressing in memory management
  • Investigate alternative RAM upgrade options for laptops
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for laptop users, hardware enthusiasts, and IT professionals looking to understand memory upgrade limitations and chipset architecture in laptops.

TylerH
Messages
729
Reaction score
0
I know what type of RAM I have: DDR3-PC3 12800 at 1600MHz. My laptop came with 2x4GB and I want to upgrade to 2x8GB and every resource I've found says 4GB per slot (and I only have 2 slots) is the most memory this laptop can use ( http://www.crucial.com/upgrade/Samsung-memory/Series+5/NP550P5C-T01US-upgrades.html ). Why would a 8GB stick of the same type and speed not work? I'm interested in the technical reasons, if anyone has any idea. I like to think I have a good understanding of computer organization, but the idea of two sticks of the same type/speed being incompatible just defies my understanding.

Thanks for your time,
Tyler
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Computer science news on Phys.org
Thanks for the informative link. I knew the logical vs physical addressing thing but not the part about the chipset.
That really sucks though. I was hoping it was some stupid mistake and I would be able to upgrade. But, then again, when, other than compiling GCC and baking fluids in Blender, will I actually use 8GB let alone 16.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K