News Wikileaks release classified documents

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cyrus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Release
Click For Summary
The recent release of over 90,000 classified military documents by Wikileaks has sparked significant controversy, catching the Pentagon unprepared for the implications of this information. The documents reportedly include after-action reports that could potentially harm military operations and reveal sensitive tactics. Critics argue that Wikileaks is biased and has previously misrepresented information, raising concerns about the credibility of the released content. The discussion also touches on the ethical implications of leaking classified information, with some viewing it as a necessary act for transparency, while others see it as a betrayal of trust that could endanger lives. The overall sentiment reflects a deep divide over the balance between government secrecy and the public's right to know.
  • #181
Proton Soup said:
but... are we really at a point where the purpose of our military is to fight evil and stamp out injustice in the world?

Which evil? The military occupation there is an evil in itself, and the proclaimed enemy now were then the "freedom fighters" that joined the "free world" in their struggle against the "evil empire" (the Soviet Union).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #182
russ_watters said:
Wow. With such a flawed view of science, it is unsurprising that you don't see how someone with a scientific worldview can be a moral absolutist.

The principle behind my moral absolutism is exactly the same as the principle behind my scientific worldview: the way the universe works/should work is logical.

Wow, and I would really believe that if you supported your claims with science-based accounts of human morality rather than gory emotive photographs.

If you claim that science backs moral absolutism, please show me where? Game theory? Cultural anthropology? Ecology? Neuroscience? I mean where is the theory and its evidence that says anything about human affairs is absolute? Cosmologists don't even say that about the laws of the universe, so who the heck knows what you think you are talking about?
 
  • #183
BobG said:
...
There is a difference and conditions for women are better under Karzai than the Taliban, but it's a stretch to say that's because Karzai is a champion of women's rights. ...

And the position of women in Afghanistan (i.e in the region that were under control of the Afghan government) was good at the time the Soviet Union was mixing into the Afghan situation (which they were asked to do by the Afghan government of that time), but then - that was for the US not something of any consideration, so they paied and trained the opposing Mujahedien (the fundamentalist Islamic fighters) cause they were then the "freedom fighters" that would free the Afghans from the "evil" Soviets...
 
  • #184
heusdens said:
And the position of women in Afghanistan (i.e in the region that were under control of the Afghan government) was good at the time the Soviet Union was mixing into the Afghan situation (which they were asked to do by the Afghan government of that time), but then - that was for the US not something of any consideration, so they paied and trained the opposing Mujahedien (the fundamentalist Islamic fighters) cause they were then the "freedom fighters" that would free the Afghans from the "evil" Soviets...

I will be very interested in any study on the position of women under Soviet Union. Thanks.
 
  • #185
The thread has gone off topic. Actually the off topic posts are more interesting than the OP. Closed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 338 ·
12
Replies
338
Views
36K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 100 ·
4
Replies
100
Views
13K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 301 ·
11
Replies
301
Views
33K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K