The discussion revolves around the implications of the Wikileaks release of US embassy cables, exploring whether this exposure of diplomatic communications constitutes a crisis or merely a public relations embarrassment. Participants debate the effects on international relations, the professionalism of diplomatic language, and the potential consequences for involved officials.
Participants do not reach a consensus; there are multiple competing views regarding the significance of the leaks, the reactions from governments, and the implications for diplomatic practices.
Some statements reflect uncertainty about the exact nature and volume of the leaked documents, as well as the potential consequences for individuals involved in the leaks.
mugaliens said:I agree that's unusually excessive and cruel. Totally against anything and everything I ever signed up for 20 years ago.
If they're at all concerned about his safety, simply put him in a jacket, a rubber room, and raise the temperature a few degrees so that he won't shiver while sleeping, and give the traitor a humanitarian night's rest.
Anything else merely negatively reflects upon the integrity of the United States as a whole, while bringing into question, "Who the hell is in charge of these going-ons?" along with a side comment, "This isn't right. Ever."
It's not true, he is not being awakened at night and he has two blankets to sleep with at night.mugaliens said:I agree that's unusually excessive and cruel. Totally against anything and everything I ever signed up for 20 years ago.