Will there be a million people on the moon by 2060?

  • Thread starter Thread starter donglepuss
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moon
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility and implications of having a million people on the moon by the year 2060. Participants explore various motivations, logistical challenges, and the potential for human or robotic presence on the moon, touching on themes of sustainability, resource exploitation, and societal implications.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express skepticism about the possibility of sustaining a million people on the moon, citing logistical challenges such as the lack of air, water, and energy.
  • Others propose that motivations for such a population could include vanity projects or resource exploitation.
  • A few participants suggest that a sustained population of robots might be more feasible for mining resources on the moon, although the practicality of this is debated.
  • Concerns are raised about the economic viability of transporting materials from the moon to Earth and the potential need for specialized robots for mining and repairs.
  • Some participants humorously speculate about the motivations for lunar habitation, including burials or high-profile vacations.
  • There is a discussion about the potential advancements in robotic technology by 2060 that could change the dynamics of lunar resource extraction.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the feasibility of having a million people on the moon by 2060. Multiple competing views remain regarding the motivations for such a population and the practicality of sustaining human or robotic life on the moon.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various assumptions about technological advancements, economic factors, and the nature of lunar habitation that remain unresolved. The discussion reflects a range of speculative scenarios without definitive conclusions.

  • #61
Continuing on with PF's First Law - why don't we have undersea cities by now? Easier and closer, and nuclear submarines have a 15 year head start on rockets to the moon.
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
russ_watters said:
Millionth customer gets free groceries.
Yeah but the delivery fee is murder.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42, russ_watters and phinds
  • #63
BWV said:
I went to a tech conference in Marin County back in 2012, the kind of resort hotel where the best and brightest In Silicon Valley need to have the strawberries on the breakfast buffet labeled ‘gluten free’. Panelists and people in idle conversation were all seriously talking about dying on Mars, like there would be a one-way shuttle available in their dotage.
Dead
 
  • #64
When we get 1000 folks living on the Moon, we will re-open this thread. Thanks all for participating.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Wrichik Basu, PeroK, russ_watters and 5 others

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
562
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
7K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
755
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
1K