Wilson's RG trajectories, Lagrangians and many worlds?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on Kenneth G. Wilson's approach to renormalization and its implications for the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. Wilson favored the path integral formulation, which is a mathematical framework for quantum mechanics, but did not endorse the idea that different renormalization group (RG) trajectories represent real, existing worlds. The consensus is that while multiple histories can be considered in theoretical physics, Wilson did not view these RG trajectories as actualized in the many-worlds sense, nor did he suggest that they would lead to radically different laws of physics governed by distinct Lagrangians.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and path integrals
  • Familiarity with renormalization group (RG) theory
  • Knowledge of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Concept of many worlds interpretation in quantum physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the mathematical formulation of path integrals in quantum mechanics
  • Study the principles of renormalization group theory in detail
  • Investigate the implications of Lagrangian mechanics in theoretical physics
  • Research the many worlds interpretation and its critiques in quantum theory
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics researchers, and students interested in advanced theoretical physics concepts, particularly those exploring the intersections of renormalization, path integrals, and interpretations of quantum mechanics.

Suekdccia
Messages
352
Reaction score
30
TL;DR
Did Kenneth G Wilson considered that RG trajectories were alternative worlds?
In this article [1] we can read an explanation about Wilson's approach to renormalization

I have read that Kenneth G Wilson favoured the path integral/many histories interpretation of Feynman in quantum mechanics to explain it. I was wondering if he did also consider that multiple worlds existed i.e favoured the many worlds interpretation. Therefore, did Wilson consider multiple histories or RG trajectories (apart from our own one for our universe) as real histories/worlds "passing" through different lagrangians?

If yes, would these different histories or universes have radically different laws of physics or be governed by fundamentally different theories of physics (since they would be governed by different lagrangians in the space of all possible lagrangians)?

Those are basically my questions.
Thank you in advance for your help

[1]: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1310.5533.pdf
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The path integral is a way of formulating quantum mechanical calculations in the mathematical formalism of classical random processes (but the path integral for fermions has no classical analogy). It is not an interpretation per se - ie. users of orthodox Copenhagen-style interpretations can derive and use path integrals with no problem.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Wilson (or anybody else as far as I know) did not consider different RG trajectories as all real in the many-world sense.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K
  • · Replies 174 ·
6
Replies
174
Views
14K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K