MHB Win a $10 or $5 Prize in Tom's 4/19 Lottery Fundraiser

  • Thread starter Thread starter heyhey11
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Tom's 4/19 lottery fundraiser involves selecting four winning numbers from 1 to 19, with various prize tiers based on how many numbers match. The participant confirmed that Tom's claim of over a 60% chance to win a $10 or $5 prize is correct, calculating a probability of approximately 63.2%. For determining an appropriate ticket price, it's suggested that the cost should be based on expected payouts and the desired fundraising goal, as it is not merely a break-even event. Additionally, the participant is seeking clarification on calculating probabilities for another scenario involving two discrete random variables, expressing uncertainty about their approach. Overall, the discussion focuses on understanding lottery probabilities and setting ticket prices for effective fundraising.
heyhey11
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
hello! I have two questions I needed some help with.

2. Tom is having a 4/19 lottery as a fundraiser; 4 winning numbers will be randomly selected without replacement out of the numbers from 1 to 19 inclusive. (similar to Ontario’s 6/49, with smaller numbers) The prizes are described below. For the questions below, define an appropriate random variable X.
Tickets Prize
All 4 winning numbers 1000 dollars
Any 3 of the winning numbers 100
Any 2 of the winning numbers 10
Any 1 of the winning numbers 5
None of the winning numbers 0
a) Tom claims that there is over a 60% chance that you can win a $10 or $5 prize. Is his claim correct?
b) What would be an appropriate cost per ticket. Explain your answer.
c) Given the cost suggested in part b), what is his expected profit on 100 tickets?
Note: Order doesn't matter for the numbers

I solved part a and got
p(X=4)= 1/19C4= 1/3876
p(X=3)= (4C3 * 15C1)/3876= 60/3876
p(X=2)= (4C2 * 15C2)/3876= 630/3876
p(X=1)= (4C1 * 15C3)/3876= 1820/3876
a. (630 + 1820)/3876≈ 0.632. which is 63.2%, so yes his claim is correct.

I needed help with b and c. For b, I know I should calculate expectations and then choose a price that gives a good revenue based on payout but I wasn't sure how.

3. A discrete random variable, X, is uniformly distributed between 1 and 10 inclusive and another discrete random variable, Y, is uniformly distributed between 5 and 15 inclusive. If one number from each set is selected at random, then determine P(Y < X ) .

I solved it the following:
(15 cases in which Y < X) ÷ (110 possible pairs) = 3/22

I got 15 cases because if Y is 5, X can be 6-10 (5 options), then if Y is 6, X can be 7-10 (4 options), if Y is 7, X can be 8-10 (3 options), if Y is 8, X can be 9 or 10 (2 options) and if Y is 9, X can be 10 ( 1 option).
5 +4+3+2+1= 15 cases in which Y < X)
and 11 X values x 10 Y values = 110 possible pairs

But I feel like it's the wrong approach as it doesn't use any probability distribution formula so I was looking for some help on it too.
Thanks in advance!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
For (b), to determine how much should be charged for a ticket, you idea would be correct if this were to be a "break even" event- all money brought in going out as prizes. But it isn't, it is a "fund-raiser"! Without knowing how much money is expected to be raised, it is impossible to say how much should be charged per ticket.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top