Windows Longhorn needs what hardware to run its best?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saint
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hardware Windows
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the hardware requirements for running Windows Longhorn, with participants debating the sufficiency of a Pentium 4 2GHz processor, 512MB DDR RAM, a 64MB AGP graphics card, and an 80GB HDD. While some believe this configuration will be adequate, others assert that significant upgrades will be necessary, predicting that Microsoft will recommend a dual-core CPU running at 4-6GHz, a minimum of 2GB of RAM, and up to 1TB of storage. The conversation also highlights concerns about software bloat, with estimates suggesting Longhorn could require around 19GB of storage based on historical data trends.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Windows operating systems, particularly Windows XP and Longhorn.
  • Familiarity with hardware specifications, including CPU, RAM, and storage requirements.
  • Knowledge of software bloat and its impact on system performance.
  • Basic mathematical skills for analyzing software size trends over time.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the final hardware specifications for Windows Longhorn upon its release.
  • Explore the performance differences between single-core and dual-core CPUs.
  • Investigate the evolution of Windows operating system sizes from Windows 3.1 to Longhorn.
  • Learn about optimizing Windows performance by managing software bloat and system resources.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for IT professionals, system builders, and anyone interested in understanding the hardware evolution required for modern operating systems, particularly those anticipating future Windows releases.

Saint
Messages
437
Reaction score
0
If I have P4 2GHz, 512GB DDRRAM, 64MB AGP card, 80GB HDD, will it be sufficient to cope with Longhorn in the future ? :smile:
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
Saint said:
If I have P4 2GHz, 512GB DDRRAM, 64MB AGP card, 80GB HDD, will it be sufficient to cope with Longhorn in the future ? :smile:

Yes, and I believe 512GB of DDRRAM should be enough :wink:
 
Sorry, 512MB DDR RAM, not GB !
 
Why even speculate about this? Right now Longhorn is still in the vaporware stage. There's no guarantee it will even see the retail shelves. Heck, its not even supposed to be released until what 06 anyway. I wouldn't worry about it until the time comes.
 
although you'll probably need an upgrade... :biggrin:
 
Nah you won't need an upgrade. Hardware is good for more years than people think. For example, Windows XP runs great on a 350mhz P2 with 320mb ram. I think that P2 will also be able to run Longhorn when the time comes (turn off all the BS eye candy though).
 
http://www.microsoft-watch.com/article2/0,1995,1581842,00.asp

Microsoft is expected to recommend that the "average" Longhorn PC feature a dual-core CPU running at 4 to 6GHz; a minimum of 2 gigs of RAM; up to a terabyte of storage; a 1 Gbit, built-in, Ethernet-wired port and an 802.11g wireless link; and a graphics processor that runs three times faster than those on the market today.

so as I was saying you'll need an serious upgrade ...

PS: good luck with your P2 Shawn :biggrin: :biggrin:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Whoa dual-core cpu, what a bunch of horsefeathers! I'll stick to my old Winblows or my XBox provided it doesn't give me that "Put your DVD in the tray" bug :)
 
Last edited:
First and foremost truth seekers, the specs aren't from microsoft. I doubt those will be the final specifications however in a year or two that might be the average computer specs for everyone. Also I highly highly doubt that lornhorn would take anywhere close to a terabyte of space, what are they going to do, send you a box of 200 dvds to install?
 
  • #10
Greg, MS does have really bloated software. Take a look at how bloated stuff gets.
According to this site, Windows 3.1 was released in 1992. I had a copy of that, it was roughly 25mb on the hard drive (which was like 1/4 of my drive!). Now fast forward by 3 years to get to Windows 95. Win95 was about 300mb (I had this OS as well). Now let's do some math to see the rate of expansion there, assuming the rate is compounding (not just simple yearly). W3 is Windows 3.1, W5 is 95. The difference in time was 3 years.

W_5 = W_3r^3

r = ^3\sqrt{\frac{W_5}{W_3}}

r = ^3\sqrt{\frac{300}{25}}

r = 2.2894

Ok, holy ****. Between 92 and 95, the size of the software increased at a rate of 129% per year!

Now compare 95 to 98. 95 was 300mb, 98 was about 500.

r = ^3\sqrt{\frac{500}{300}}

r = 1.1856

From 95 to 98, the rate of expansion was 18.6% yearly.

Now compare 98 to XP Home (2001). Win98 was 500mb, WinXP Home is 1973mb (1413mb Windows folder, 560mb Documents and Settings folder).

r = ^3\sqrt{\frac{1973}{500}}

r = 1.5802

Between 98 and 2001, the yearly expansion was 58.0%.

Now to decide how to expect the changes. First of all, Win3.1 to 95 was a completely new system, big change. 95 to 98 was essentially the same system. 98 to XP was a big-ish change, just like Longhorn is expected to be. Longhorn is a totally revamped system; therefore, I think the change would be the most like the change from 98 to XP.

So now let's fill in the numbers at a rate of 58.0% yearly for 5 years (XP was 2001, Longhorn is expected 2006 was it?).

W_{lh} = W_{xp}r^5

W_{lh} = (1973)(1.580)^5

W_{lh} = 19427

Divide that by 1024 and we end up with 18.97GB. About 19GB. Any problems with my math?
 
  • #11
19GB seems a bit excessive, even by microsoft's standard. If it really is that big than longhorn better come with office, visual studios and much much more.
 
  • #12
Excessive you say? I think not. How big was Win2k, like 900mb? I had that OS about a year ago but I can't remember how big it was. From 2000 to 2001 (XP), they've managed to add a whole bunch of useless crap (over 500mb worth). Even though my computer is a 2500+ at 3200+ speeds, it still lags pretty bad when all the eye candy crap is turned on. Turn that junk off and the system runs great. If only I could find a way to remove that extra junk.
 
  • #13
ShawnD said:
Greg, MS does have really bloated software. Take a look at how bloated stuff gets.
According to this site, Windows 3.1 was released in 1992. I had a copy of that, it was roughly 25mb on the hard drive (which was like 1/4 of my drive!). Now fast forward by 3 years to get to Windows 95. Win95 was about 300mb (I had this OS as well). Now let's do some math to see the rate of expansion there, assuming the rate is compounding (not just simple yearly). W3 is Windows 3.1, W5 is 95. The difference in time was 3 years.

W_5 = W_3r^3

r = ^3\sqrt{\frac{W_5}{W_3}}

r = ^3\sqrt{\frac{300}{25}}

r = 2.2894

Ok, holy ****. Between 92 and 95, the size of the software increased at a rate of 129% per year!

Now compare 95 to 98. 95 was 300mb, 98 was about 500.

r = ^3\sqrt{\frac{500}{300}}

r = 1.1856

From 95 to 98, the rate of expansion was 18.6% yearly.

Now compare 98 to XP Home (2001). Win98 was 500mb, WinXP Home is 1973mb (1413mb Windows folder, 560mb Documents and Settings folder).

r = ^3\sqrt{\frac{1973}{500}}

r = 1.5802

Between 98 and 2001, the yearly expansion was 58.0%.

Now to decide how to expect the changes. First of all, Win3.1 to 95 was a completely new system, big change. 95 to 98 was essentially the same system. 98 to XP was a big-ish change, just like Longhorn is expected to be. Longhorn is a totally revamped system; therefore, I think the change would be the most like the change from 98 to XP.

So now let's fill in the numbers at a rate of 58.0% yearly for 5 years (XP was 2001, Longhorn is expected 2006 was it?).

W_{lh} = W_{xp}r^5

W_{lh} = (1973)(1.580)^5

W_{lh} = 19427

Divide that by 1024 and we end up with 18.97GB. About 19GB. Any problems with my math?


Holy c**p! I couldn't do that kinda maths if my life depended on it!
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
928
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
13K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K