MHB Wire Length w/ 0.068 Ohms & 2.8mm Diameter: ~11.56 ft

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the length of a wire based on its resistance and diameter. The resistance of a wire is directly proportional to its length and inversely proportional to the square of its diameter. Given a wire that is 50 feet long with a resistance of 0.265 ohms and a diameter of 2 millimeters, the constant of proportionality, k, was determined to be 0.0212. Using this value, the formula for resistance was adjusted to find the length of a wire with a resistance of 0.068 ohms and a diameter of 2.8 millimeters. The calculations lead to the conclusion that the length of the wire is approximately 11.56 feet.
unicorngirl
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
The electrical resistance of a wire varies directly with the length of the wire and inversely with the square of the diameter of the wire. If a wire 50 feet long and 2 millimeters in diameter has a resistance of 0.265 ohms, find the length of a wire of the same material whose resistance is 0.068 ohms and whose diameter is 2.8 millimeters. The length of the wire is approximately ___ feet when the resistance is 0.068 ohms and the diameter is 2.8 millimeters. (Round to the nearest hundredth.)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello and welcome to MHB, unicorngirl! :D

I have moved your thread, since this problem type is generally encountered in an algebra course, and not a calculus-based statistics course.

We are told:

The electrical resistance of a wire varies directly with the length of the wire and inversely with the square of the diameter of the wire.

So, if we define:

$$R$$ = resistance
$$L$$ = length
$$D$$ = diameter

We may then take the above sentence, and express it mathematically as:

$$R=k\frac{L}{D^2}\tag{1}$$

where $k$ is the constant of proportionality.

To determine $k$, we may use the given information:

A wire 50 feet long and 2 millimeters in diameter has a resistance of 0.265 ohms.

Plug the values into (1)...what do you find for the magnitude and dimensions for $k$?
 
Okay thank you! I wasn't sure where to post it.

I got .0212 for K. I hope I did that right.
 
unicorngirl said:
Okay thank you! I wasn't sure where to post it.

I got .0212 for K. I hope I did that right.

Yes, the value you obtained is correct! (Yes)

We should at least be aware of the units for $k$:

$$k=\frac{D^2R}{L}=\frac{(2\text{ mm})^2(0.265\,\Omega)}{50\text{ ft}}=0.0212\frac{\text{mm}^2\Omega}{\text{ft}}$$

So now, using rational rather than decimal notation, we may state:

$$R=\frac{53D^2}{2500L}\tag{2}$$

Now, you have a question to answer:

Find the length of a wire of the same material whose resistance is 0.068 ohms and whose diameter is 2.8 millimeters.

So, solve (2) for $L$, and then plug in the given values for $R$ and $D$.

What do you find?
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top