Wire tension that might involve tensors

In summary: Yes, that is correct.When you sum the forces in the parallel and perpendicular directions, you get the tension in the wire.
  • #1
e2m2a
354
11
I need help with this problem. This is not a homework assignment, so please don’t send it over to the homework forum.

It involves mechanical engineering dynamics that probably are more subtle and advanced then first year mechanical engineering dynamics. It might involve tensor analysis. I don’t know.

We let a mass, designated as ##m_2##, slide along a straight track with one degree of freedom with no friction. The track is rigidly attached to the earth. There is a wire attached to ##m_2## so that it can be pulled at a constant acceleration. Attached on the other end of the wire is a second mass, designated as ##m_1##. A known force of magnitude F is applied to ##m_1##, such as a magnetic force, accelerating ##m_1## and ##m_2## along the track. We define the motion of ##m_1##-##m_2## to be in the positive y-direction. The wire makes an angle ##\theta## with respect to the x-axis, and for this problem we keep the angle ##\theta## constant. Thus, the givens are: ##m_1##, ##m_2##, F, and the angle ##\theta##. I want to know the tension in the wire for any constant angle ##\theta## between 0 and 90 degrees with the above givens.

On the surface this might seem like a trivial problem, but when I do a deeper analysis, it seems to be more complicated than I can handle. For example, when ##\theta## is zero degrees, intuitively, the tension in the wire would be at a maximum, and there would be no acceleration of ##m_1##-##m_2## in the positive y-direction, and when ##\theta## is 90 degrees, the tension would be a minimum, and there would be a maximum acceleration of m1-m2. But what would the tension in the wire be at any angle between zero and 90 degrees? I can’t get my head around this. Could someone please help me with this?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
This does not sound too difficult, but I urge you to post a figure showing the situation and identifying the variables for clarity. If you do, I think you will have the help you need in short order.
 
  • #4
Thank you, Berkeman.

CWatters is definitely correct about the FBD, except that you need two FBDs, not just one. Draw them, write the equations of motion for each body, and solve for the tension. If you get stuck, but sure to post the work you have done.

I cannot imagine why you think tensors might be required in this simple problem. It really is not that hard at all.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
  • #6
Dr.D said:
Thank you, Berkeman.

CWatters is definitely correct about the FBD, except that you need two FBDs, not just one. Draw them, write the equations of motion for each body, and solve for the tension. If you get stuck, but sure to post the work you have done.

I cannot imagine why you think tensors might be required in this simple problem. It really is not that hard at all.
So, I need to draw a FBD for ##m_1## and another FBD for ##m_2##, and then solve a system of equations from the two diagrams? I will try.
 
  • #7
The diagram link opens to a blank page for me ?
 
  • #9
As an intuitive guess, I think the final expression for T would be as follows:

The tension force with respect to the x-axis would be:

##T_x = cos\theta F##

The tension force with respect to the y-axis would be:

##T_y = sin\theta \frac{m_2}{m_1 + m_2} F##

Thus, T would be:

##T = \sqrt{T_x^2 + T_y^2}##

Is this correct?
 
  • #10
Rather than guess, why not write the equations of motion for the particles and work it out mathematically?
 
  • #11
Nidum said:
The diagram link opens to a blank page for me ?

It opened OK for me using Libre Office.
 
  • #12
Dr.D said:
Rather than guess, why not write the equations of motion for the particles and work it out mathematically?
When I try to set up the equations of motion, all of the trigonometric expressions cancel out. I don't know how to set up the equations of motion correctly.
 
  • #13
Write the sum of forces on each body, once in the direction parallel to the guide and again in the direction perpendicular to the guide.

Be sure to post your work if you need more help.
 
  • #14
Dr.D said:
Write the sum of forces on each body, once in the direction parallel to the guide and again in the direction perpendicular to the guide.

Be sure to post your work if you need more help.
I think this is what I am suppose to do:

Forces on ##m_1##:

$$a_y = \frac{sin\theta F – sin\theta T} {m_1}$$

$$a_x = \frac{cos\theta F – cos\theta T} {m_1}$$Forces on ##m_2##. (I have to introduce the constant ##m_e##, the mass of the earth).

$$a_y = \frac{sin\theta T} {m_2}$$

$$a_x = \frac{cos\theta T} {m_e + m_2}$$But I am not sure what to do next, for if I equate the terms for ##a_y## and ##a_x##, all the trig expressions drop out, which leads to an answer that doesn't make sense. (The tension is constant for all angles of ## \theta##).
 
  • #15
There is an error in your diagram that is probably leading you astray. The applied force F cannot be colinear with the wire.

In addition, you need to think through the kinematic relations between the motions of the two particles.
 
  • #16
Dr.D said:
There is an error in your diagram that is probably leading you astray. The applied force F cannot be colinear with the wire.

In addition, you need to think through the kinematic relations between the motions of the two particles.
Why is the applied F not colinear with the wire? I do not understand that. The tension force must be colinear with the wire, so why not F? I have defined the force F to be colinear with the wire, but if this is not physically possible, can you please explain why this is not possible? In addition, if F is not colinear, then this would cause ##m_1## to rotate and this is a complication I did not define to happen.
 
Last edited:
  • #17
Both m1 and m2 must accelerate parallel to the guide. If F and T are colinear, there is no component of the sum of forces on m1 available to accelerate m1.

Rather than drawing F, draw simply two components, Fx, and Fy, and don't worry about exactly what direction they are in. This should clarify what happens considerably.

This is not a hard problem; do not make it one. But do not impose misunderstanding up on by insisting the F and T be colinear.
 

1. What is the relationship between wire tension and tensors?

Wire tension is directly related to tensors, as tensors are mathematical objects that represent physical quantities such as tension, stress, and strain. In the context of wire tension, tensors can be used to describe the magnitude and direction of the force exerted on a wire, as well as how the wire will deform under this tension.

2. How do tensors affect the strength of a wire?

Tensors play a crucial role in determining the strength of a wire. The magnitude and direction of the wire's tension, as well as the material properties of the wire, can all be described using tensors. By analyzing these tensors, scientists and engineers can determine the maximum load a wire can withstand before breaking.

3. Can tensors be used to predict wire failure?

Yes, tensors can be used to predict wire failure. By analyzing the tensors that describe the tension and stress on a wire, scientists can determine if the wire is approaching its breaking point. This information can be used to prevent wire failure and ensure the safety of structures and equipment.

4. How does wire tension affect the shape of an object?

Wire tension, described by tensors, can greatly impact the shape of an object. When a wire is under tension, it can cause the object it is attached to to deform or change shape. This is because the force exerted by the wire is transferred to the object, causing it to stretch or compress along certain directions depending on the orientation of the wire.

5. Are there different types of tensors that apply to wire tension?

Yes, there are different types of tensors that can be used to describe wire tension. For example, a second-order tensor, also known as a stress tensor, is commonly used to describe the force and stress applied to a wire. Additionally, a third-order tensor, known as a strain tensor, can be used to describe the deformation of a wire under tension.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
620
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
30
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
22
Views
824
Replies
1
Views
428
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
68
Views
9K
Back
Top