Without the prefix: What do you want to do?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zeronem
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around various aspirations and goals, primarily in creative and academic fields. Key points include a desire to create historical and non-violent science fiction films, compose classical music, and contribute to mathematics and theoretical physics, with aspirations of winning a Nobel Prize. There is also a strong interest in pursuing higher education at Ivy League institutions, becoming a professor, and working as a NASA engineer. Additionally, participants express personal dreams such as traveling, writing books, and achieving happiness. The conversation highlights the importance of setting ambitious goals while acknowledging the challenges and uncertainties of achieving them. Overall, the thread emphasizes the pursuit of passions and the encouragement to strive for personal dreams, regardless of current circumstances.
  • #31
At most of the major universities, I would be very surprised if there wasn't a supervisor in at least one of these areas willing to supervise a Phd in the area with applications to quantum computing.


Aye, one of the stated research activities where I am is Quantum Information and Quantum Computation, both in the Mathematics department, and in the Theoretical Physics research Group. It's all part of whatever topics are seen as most 'popular' and potential moneyspinners. In the mid 90's it was all Biochemistry, now you'd be hard pressed to find a University that wasn't pouring resources into and creating PhD placements in the fields of Genetics (particularly the prospect of stem cell research), Quantum Computation, and Nanotechnology (the university I'm at is currently in the process of building a centre for research into Nanotechnology).

Of course, this happens much to the displeasure of other research groups who can only watch as their funding fluctuates with the changes in whatever's the latest topic to get the research councils and Parliamentary Ministers excited
:wink:

Although most, if not all decent universities here seem to state entry requirements for a research degree to be a 2:1 (US equivalent a GPA of about 3.0), I'd agree that to get a place in a field so 'popular' you'd probably need a good First and some pretty damn happy references.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
This is very disappointing thread. It seems acquiring a PhD is thought to be the goal for many rather than the means to achieve a goal. By the end of the junior year in HS, one should have a good concept of what his career path would be, certainly by the time when it is necessary to select a major.

Regards
 
  • #33
Hey! I said I wanted to be a latter day Fonz, and even went on to say that PhD's were useless in comparison to Fonzness!
 
  • #34
Originally posted by GENIERE
This is very disappointing thread. It seems acquiring a PhD is thought to be the goal for many rather than the means to achieve a goal. By the end of the junior year in HS, one should have a good concept of what his career path would be, certainly by the time when it is necessary to select a major.

Regards

A Phd is a good goal to have.
To say that in 10 years time you want a Phd is a reasonable goal to get through the education system. It says nothing about any subsequent desire to be e.g. a lecturer or professor.

I fail to see where your dissapointment comes from.
 

Similar threads

Replies
80
Views
6K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
10K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K