WKB and perturbation theory.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the comparison between the WKB (Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin) method and perturbation theory in quantum mechanics, specifically for a Hamiltonian defined as H=H_0 + εV(x). It concludes that for small ε, WKB and perturbation theory can yield significantly different results for energy eigenvalues due to the nature of the small parameters involved. The divergence issues in the functional integral approach in perturbation theory contrast with the finite results obtainable through the WKB method, particularly for free particle scenarios where WKB provides exact solutions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hamiltonian mechanics, specifically H=H_0 + εV(x)
  • Familiarity with WKB approximation techniques in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of perturbation theory and its application in quantum systems
  • Basic grasp of functional integrals and their divergences in quantum field theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of the WKB approximation in quantum mechanics
  • Explore perturbation theory in quantum mechanics, focusing on its limitations and divergences
  • Investigate the implications of IR and UV divergences in functional integrals
  • Learn about the relationship between small parameters in quantum mechanics and their impact on solutions
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, graduate students in theoretical physics, and researchers interested in the nuances of quantum mechanics and the comparison of approximation methods.

tpm
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
for a Hamiltonian H=H_0 + \epsilon V(x)

my question is (for small epsilon) can WKB and perturbative approach give very different solutions ?? to energies eigenvalues and so on the index '0' means that is the Hamiltonian of a free particle.

problem arises perhaps in calculation of:

\int \mathcal D [x] exp(iS[x]/\hbar)

with the action S[x]=S_0 [x] +\epsilon V[x]

here the main problem is that in perturbation theory the functional integral may be divergent (due to IR and UV divergences) but in WKB (semiclassical approach) the integral can be 'calculated' (given finite meaning),

hence i'd like to know if at least for perturbative case you can use WKB approach (with some re-scaled constant) to deal with perturbation theory..note that for the 'free particle' no interaction WKB gives exact methods..thankx.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Technically, WKB and "perturbation theory" are both perturbative expansions in what are presumed to be "small quantities". In the case of your "perturbation theory", the small parameter is the \epsilon, whereas in the WKB approximation, you have expanded the propagator to first order in \hbar, so evidently the total action of the trajectories is large compared to Planck's constant, which sets the scale for action in quantum mechanics.

Thus, you can get two very different answers depending on what exactly is "small".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K