- #1
- 1,047
- 785
http://nautil.us/issue/93/forerunners/the-synchronicity-of-wolfgang-pauli-and-carl-jung
Wolfgang Pauli & Carl Jung: The Synchronicity of Two Minds
- Thread starter Swamp Thing
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Pauli
Click For Summary
SUMMARY
The discussion centers on the intellectual relationship between physicist Wolfgang Pauli and psychologist Carl Jung, particularly focusing on Jung's influence on Pauli's exploration of mysticism and symbolism. Pauli's exclusion principle is highlighted as a foundational concept in chemistry, emphasizing his significant contributions to the field. The conversation also touches on the challenges of discussing Jung's ideas in contemporary academic settings, particularly due to the stigma associated with his theories. Overall, the forum reflects a tension between scientific rigor and the exploration of philosophical ideas.
PREREQUISITES- Understanding of Wolfgang Pauli's exclusion principle in quantum mechanics.
- Familiarity with Carl Jung's psychological theories, particularly his concepts of archetypes and collective unconscious.
- Knowledge of the intersection between psychology and physics, particularly in the context of mysticism.
- Awareness of contemporary academic attitudes towards discussing non-empirical theories in psychology.
- Research the implications of Wolfgang Pauli's exclusion principle on modern chemistry.
- Explore Carl Jung's theories on archetypes and their relevance in psychological practice.
- Investigate the role of mysticism in scientific thought, particularly in the works of notable physicists.
- Examine the current academic discourse surrounding the integration of psychology and philosophy in scientific research.
Psychologists, physicists, philosophy enthusiasts, and anyone interested in the interplay between science and mysticism will benefit from this discussion.
- #2
epenguin
Science Advisor
- 3,637
- 1,014
I've always had an open mind towards the ideas of Jung despite the scientific dodginess, on the basis that in the areas covered it was something like that or nothing at present. (Jordan Peterson is trying a revival of them - he recounts that in academic and clinical psychology it has been career death to even mention his name.) But I thought Jung's pretensions to universal philosophy embracing e.g. physics was overextension of his understanding. Especially when combined with the near impenetrability of a lot of his writing.
Stuff here about Pauli I didn't know. Sure without his exclusion principle there would be no chemistry or it would be unrecognisably different, is that right? But the guy lost out to a chemist!
Stuff here about Pauli I didn't know. Sure without his exclusion principle there would be no chemistry or it would be unrecognisably different, is that right? But the guy lost out to a chemist!
- #3
Evo
Staff Emeritus
- 24,032
- 3,277
Sorry, a couple of reasons this thread is closed. We do not allow threads opened with just a link with no comments on why you are posting it or what value it has and the issue you wish to discuss.Swamp Thing said:
From your link
The subject of Jung isn't allowed as we no longer allow this type of discussion.
Similar threads
- · Replies 5 ·
- · Replies 2 ·
- · Replies 17 ·
- · Replies 47 ·
- · Replies 38 ·
- · Replies 500 ·
Graduate
RIP Edwin F Taylor (1931-2025)
- · Replies 3 ·
- · Replies 5 ·
Graduate
Review in Nature by Geoff Brumfiel
- · Replies 0 ·
- · Replies 1 ·