Wolfram Alpha: Your Ultimate Online Computational Knowledge Engine

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 5K views
Orion1
Messages
961
Reaction score
3
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/60P7717-XOQ&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/60P7717-XOQ&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>
Reference:
http://www.wolframalpha.com/"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I watched this the other day, and couldn't help but grin as he somewhat nervously revealed why he has spent so much time and effort on this project: Physics. Once a physicist, always a physicist I suppose.

I don't know what to think about NKS though. It sounds good in theory but where are the models? More fundamental work needs to be done if anyone is going to be convinced that NKS is useful.