Wondering if $R$ is a P.I.D.: Free Modules and Ideals

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Modules
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

If every $R$-submodule of a free $R$-module is free, then the commutative ring $R$ with unit is a Principal Ideal Domain (P.I.D.). This conclusion follows from the fact that a nonzero ideal of $R$ is an $R$-submodule of the free $R$-module $R$, which is free by hypothesis. Therefore, each nonzero ideal is principal, generated by an element that is not a zero-divisor in $R$.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of commutative rings with unit
  • Knowledge of free modules and their properties
  • Familiarity with ideals and submodules in ring theory
  • Concept of zero-divisors in rings
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Principal Ideal Domains (P.I.D.s)
  • Learn about the structure of free modules in algebra
  • Explore the relationship between ideals and submodules in commutative algebra
  • Investigate the implications of zero-divisors in ring theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebraists, and students studying abstract algebra, particularly those focused on module theory and ring theory.

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

Let $R$ be a commutative ring with unit.
I want to show that if each $R$-submodule of a free $R$-module is free then $R$ is P.I.D..

From the thread http://mathhelpboards.com/linear-abstract-algebra-14/how-can-we-conclude-i-principal-ideal-18593.html we have that if an ideal of $R$ is a free $R$-module then it is a principal ideal that is generated by an element $a$ that is not a zero-divisor in $R$.

Do we conclude from that that $R$ is P.I.D. ? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi mathmari,

Yes, you can use that fact to conclude $R$ is a PID. After all, a nonzero ideal of $R$ is an $R$-submodule of the free $R$-module $R$; it is free by hypothesis. So by the result you quoted, the ideal is principal generated by an element that is not a zero divisor.
 
Euge said:
a nonzero ideal of $R$ is an $R$-submodule of the free $R$-module $R$;

Why does this stand? (Wondering)
 
A nonzero ideal $N$ of $R$ must closed under addition and satisfy the condition that $rn\in N$ for all $r\in R$ and $n\in N$. Thus $N$ is closed under addition and scalar multiplication, making $N$ an $R$-submodule of $R$.
 
Euge said:
A nonzero ideal $N$ of $R$ must closed under addition and satisfy the condition that $rn\in N$ for all $r\in R$ and $n\in N$. Thus $N$ is closed under addition and scalar multiplication, making $N$ an $R$-submodule of $R$.

So, we have that each nonzero ideal of $R$ is an $R$-submodule of $R$.
Is also each $R$-submodule of $R$ a nonzero ideal of $R$ ? (Wondering)
 
Not quite. Every ideal (yes, including $0$) is an $R$-submodule. So, to put it plainly, the $R$-submodules of $R$ are the ideals of $R$. (I just focused on nonzero ideals for the sake of this particular problem.)
 
Euge said:
Not quite. Every ideal (yes, including $0$) is an $R$-submodule. So, to put it plainly, the $R$-submodules of $R$ are the ideals of $R$. (I just focused on nonzero ideals for the sake of this particular problem.)

I understand! Thank you very much! (Yes)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K