MHB Word problem - linear equation.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a word problem involving the dimensions of a rectangular swimming pool and its surrounding cement walk. The pool's length is defined as twice its width, and the area of the walk is given as 748 ft². The calculations show that using the variable x for the pool's width leads to dimensions of 28.5 ft by 57 ft. However, there is confusion regarding a discrepancy with a textbook answer of 30 ft by 60 ft, which suggests an area of 784 ft² for the walk. Participants agree that the textbook answer may be incorrect based on the provided area of the walk.
paulmdrdo1
Messages
382
Reaction score
0
please help me with this problem

please use single variable only.

The length of a rectangular swimming pool is twice its width. The pool is surrounded by a cement walk 4ft wide. If the area of the walk is 748 ft^2, determine the dimensions of the pool.

let x = width of the pool
2x = length of the pool

the dimensions of the pool and cement walk combined

x+8 = width
2x+8 = length

the area of the pool plus the area of the cement walk is equal to the whole area.

$(2x+8)(x+8)=748+2x^2$

$x= 28.5$

the dimensions of the pool is 28.5 ft by 57 ft.

but the answer in my book is 30 ft. by 60 ft. why is that? where did I miss?

regards!

please use one variable only.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The area of the walk (using your variables) is:

$$2(4x+4(2x+8))=748$$

$$4(6x+16)=748$$

$$6x+16=187$$

$$6x=171$$

$$x=28.5$$

I agree with you.
 
If the answer is 30 ft x 60 ft then the area of the walk would be 784, not 748. Did you read the question correctly?
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top