Work and frequency caused by mutual potential energy

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the mutual potential energy of a Li+ ion and an I- ion, described by the equation U(r)=(-Ke^2/r)+(A/r^10). Participants are tasked with determining the work required to separate the ions and the frequency of vibrations of the Li+ ion, given specific constants and an equilibrium distance.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of the 1/r^10 term in the potential energy equation and express uncertainty about the value of A. Some suggest that the instructor may expect them to leave A as an unknown. Others explore the relationship between the equilibrium position and the potential energy function.

Discussion Status

Some participants have made progress in calculating the work by deriving A from the potential energy function. However, there remains confusion regarding the implications of small values when evaluating the potential energy at the equilibrium distance, particularly for the second derivative used to find the spring constant.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of working with very small values in calculations and discuss potential strategies for managing these numerical issues, including unit conversions and scientific notation.

phys17
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

Homework Statement


Here is the question:
The mutual potential energy of a Li+ ion and an I- ion as a function of their separation r is expressed fairly well by the equation U(r)=(-Ke^2/r)+(A/r^10), where the first term arises from the Coulomb interaction, and the values of its constant are:

K= 9x10^9 N-m^2/C^2, e=1.6x10^-19 C

The equilibrium distance rnot between the centers of these ions in the LiI molecule is about 2.4 Angstrom. On the basis of this info,

(a) How much work in eV must be done to tear these ions completely away from each other?

(b) Taking the I- ion to be fixed b/c it is so massive, what is the frequency in Hz of the Li+ ion in vibrations of very small amplitude? Take the mass of Li+ as 10^/26



The Attempt at a Solution



I used the U(r) formula to find the work, but how can you find the work without knowing what A is?
For part b, i found the second derivative of the U(r) function to get the value of the spring constant, k. Again, how do we know what the value of A is?

Thanks for any and all help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi phys17,

Never in all my years have I encountered a 1/r^10 term in a potential. Am I reading this correctly - you mean 'one over r to the power of ten'? I guess there's nothing actually wrong with that - you can write down any wild potential you want - but I don't think anyone here is going to be able to guess what that term could possibly be or what the 'A' is without some more information. That being said, your ideas on how to deal with the vibrations via a spring constant are very good - well done, I think that is correct! Is it possible that your instructor meant for you to leave things in terms of A? Because with the information interpreted literally and as given, that's the best you can do. Sorry I don't have more insight, but I think we need some more information or your instructor needs to explain what this term is supposed to be.

Hope this helps,
Bill Mills
 
Last edited by a moderator:
phys17 said:
Hi everyone,

Homework Statement


Here is the question:
The mutual potential energy of a Li+ ion and an I- ion as a function of their separation r is expressed fairly well by the equation U(r)=(-Ke^2/r)+(A/r^10), where the first term arises from the Coulomb interaction, and the values of its constant are:

K= 9x10^9 N-m^2/C^2, e=1.6x10^-19 C

The equilibrium distance rnot between the centers of these ions in the LiI molecule is about 2.4 Angstrom. On the basis of this info,

(a) How much work in eV must be done to tear these ions completely away from each other?

(b) Taking the I- ion to be fixed b/c it is so massive, what is the frequency in Hz of the Li+ ion in vibrations of very small amplitude? Take the mass of Li+ as 10^/26

The Attempt at a Solution



I used the U(r) formula to find the work, but how can you find the work without knowing what A is?
For part b, i found the second derivative of the U(r) function to get the value of the spring constant, k. Again, how do we know what the value of A is?

Thanks for any and all help!

Welcome to PF :smile:

Here's a hint: what must be true about U(r) at the equilibrium position r=rnot=2.4Å?
billVancouver said:
Hi phys17,

Never in all my years have I encountered a 1/r^10 term in a potential.
I imagine it's an approximation for when then two ions are close together. Somewhat akin to the 1/r12 term in the Lennard-Jones potential typically used for neutral atoms.
Am I reading this correctly - you mean 'one over r to the power of ten'? I guess there's nothing actually wrong with that - you can write down any wild potential you want - but I don't think anyone here is going to be able to guess what that term could possibly be or what the 'A' is without some more information.
Don't forget, we are given the equilibrium position.
That being said, your ideas on how to deal with the vibrations via a spring constant are very good - well done, I think that is correct! Is it possible that your instructor meant for you to leave things in terms of A? Because with the information interpreted literally and as given, that's the best you can do. Sorry I don't have more insight, but I think we need some more information or your instructor needs to explain what this term is supposed to be.

Hope this helps,
Bill Mills
 
Thanks so much, guys!

I figured out part a today. To find A, I found the derivative of U(r), set it equal to 0 and then solved for A, since that is the unknown. From there, it's easy to find the work - just substitute all the numbers in.

I ran into trouble for part b. Since the spring constant is the second derivative of U(r), I evaluated at that second derivative. BUT, 2.4 Angstrom converted to meters is a really small value, so when I do A/r^10, I just get 0.
 
There are a couple of way around that, that I can think of:

1. Use eV and Å for units, instead of J and m. The numbers should be closer to "regular size" that way, i.e. neither extremely small or extremely large in magnitude.

or

2. Work in scientific notation. Use the calculator to work the between-1-and-10 part of the numbers, and use pen and paper to work the 10xxx's

If you're still stuck, by all means post your work here. Otherwise these suggestions are just a stab in the dark at helping you out.

EDIT added: #3 - use Google as your calculator, it can handle 1/(2.4Å)10:

http://www.google.com/#hl=en&sclien....,cf.osb&fp=3226d37ade666d03&biw=1280&bih=638
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K