Work done against friction for a car with 125 KJ KE.

AI Thread Summary
A 1200 kg car with 125 kJ of kinetic energy ascends a 20-degree slope to a height of 10 m. The gravitational potential energy at the top is calculated as 117,720 J, leading to an energy loss of 7,280 J, which represents the work done against friction. The discussion reveals confusion regarding the interpretation of the height versus distance traveled up the slope. Participants confirm that the energy lost equals the work done against friction if friction is the only energy loss. The thread highlights the importance of ensuring accurate problem details for correct calculations.
Molly1235
Messages
77
Reaction score
4
"A 1200kg car as kinetic energy 125kJ at the bottom of a 20 degree slope. It rises to a height of 10m. Calculate work done against friction."

Relevant equations:

Work = force x distance in direction of that force

Work = KE = 1/2 x m x v^2

I'm not really sure where to start...tried several things but haven't got anywhere.

For example:

Work done = KE
125000J = 1/2 x 1200 x v^2
V^2 = 125000/600 = 208.3
V = 14.4 m/s

Or

GPE at top of slope = mgh
1200 x 9.81 x 10 = 117,720

Energy lost = 125000 - 117720 = 7280 J

But neither of these answer the question.

Also tried

Distance traveled = 10/sin20 = 29.24m

So f = 125000/29.24 = 4274.9J buy apparently that's wrong.

Someone please help? :-)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Molly1235 said:
GPE at top of slope = mgh
1200 x 9.81 x 10 = 117,720

Energy lost = 125000 - 117720 = 7280 J
This is the one you want.

If that's not right: Are you sure it says "rises to a height " of 10m? Maybe they meant that it travels up the ramp a distance of 10 m?
 
Doc Al said:
This is the one you want.

If that's not right: Are you sure it says "rises to a height " of 10m? Maybe they meant that it travels up the ramp a distance of 10 m?

I tried it that way as well and none of the answers match up (it's multiple choice). Hm, perhaps I copied the answers/some of the question down wrong!
 
Doc Al said:
This is the one you want.

If that's not right: Are you sure it says "rises to a height " of 10m? Maybe they meant that it travels up the ramp a distance of 10 m?

So just to confirm, would the energy lost be the same as the work done against friction?
 
Molly1235 said:
So just to confirm, would the energy lost be the same as the work done against friction?
Yes, assuming friction is the only source of energy "loss".
 
Molly1235 said:
I tried it that way as well and none of the answers match up (it's multiple choice). Hm, perhaps I copied the answers/some of the question down wrong!

What are the choices?
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top