Work, Energy, and Power problems

  • Thread starter Thread starter Twilit_Truth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Power Work
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around problems related to work, energy, and power, specifically focusing on scenarios involving potential and kinetic energy in the context of a pole vaulter and a crate sliding down an incline.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the conversion of potential energy to kinetic energy and the impact of friction on motion. Questions arise regarding the calculation of gravitational potential energy and the role of mass in energy equations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problems, offering insights into energy conservation principles and the work-energy theorem. Some have provided calculations and expressed uncertainty about their results, while others are questioning assumptions about mass and energy conversions.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on disregarding air resistance in the pole vault problem, and the crate problem involves specific values for weight, friction, and incline length. Participants are also navigating the implications of insufficient energy to overcome friction.

Twilit_Truth
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Ok, this is the last day I have to work on this stuff, so please bear with me. I'll be posting questions in this thread as needed, so check back in every once in a while please.

A pole vaulter clears 6.00 m. With what velocity does the vaulter strike the mat in the landing area? (Disregard air resistance. g = 9.81 m/s^2)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At 6.00m what is the vaulter's gravitational p.e.? Since you are disregarding air resistance, what is all the energy going to be converted to?
 
But PE = mgh, and I don't have m.
 
While that is true, as the vaulter falls, kinetic energy is gained while potential energy is lost. What does that mean now?
 
mgh = 1/2 mv^2. Masses cancel. Thanks.
 
New problem.

A 40.0 N crate starting at rest slides down a rough 6.0 m long ramp inclined at 30.0 degrees with the horizontal. The force of friction between the crate and the ramp is 6.0 N. Using the work-kinetic energy theorem, find the velocity of the crate at the bottom of the incline.
 
Well at the top of the 6m incline the crate has PE, and as it slides down all the PE is converted to KE and work done in overcoming friction.
 
work done in overcoming friction?
 
Twilit_Truth said:
work done in overcoming friction?
Yes, if there is not sufficient energy to overcome friction, then the block won't move. But the work done in overcoming friction is just simply Force*Distance
 
  • #10
Yes, if there is not sufficient energy to overcome friction, then the block won't move. But the work done in overcoming friction is just simply Force*Distance

And force is the downward force and distance is 6.0 m?
 
  • #11
Twilit_Truth said:
And force is the downward force and distance is 6.0 m?
The frictional force is the opposite direction of the motion of the crate.So it is the frictional force*distance(6)
 
  • #12
The frictional force you speak of is 6.0 N, right?
 
  • #13
Twilit_Truth said:
The frictional force you speak of is 6.0 N, right?

Indeed
 
  • #14
Ok, I did this:

mgh=PE
PE=(40.0)(9.81)(3)=1177.2 J

I got the height by this:

6.0 * sin(30)=3

then:

PE=KE+W
PE-W=KE
W=F(6.0 N)*d(6.0 m)=36 J
1177.2-36=1141.2 J

That might be where I messed up, but I kept going:

KE=1/2mv^2
2KE=mv^2
2KE/m=v^2
(2(1141.2))/40.0=v^2
57.06=v^2

So, the square root of 57.06 equals velocity, but it doesn't match the answers I have. It is a multiple choice question, here are the anwers:

A) 8.7 m/s

B) 3.3 m/s

C) 4.5 m/s

D) 6.4 m/s

What did I do wrong?
 
  • #15
Here m is not equual to 40. mg = 40N. SO m = 40/9.81 kg
 

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
35
Views
10K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K