Work energy principle and power

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around the application of the work-energy principle in a physics problem involving a golf ball. The ball, with a mass of 45.9g, is hit at a speed of 180 km/h, reaches a height of 20m, and experiences an average resistance force of 0.2N. The calculations for the speed of the ball before landing on the green, which is 4m lower than the tee, yield a result of 35 m/s. Additionally, the energy absorbed by the green upon impact is calculated to be approximately 30.3J, demonstrating the conservation of energy principle.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the work-energy theorem
  • Knowledge of kinetic and potential energy calculations
  • Familiarity with resistance force concepts
  • Ability to perform calculations involving significant figures
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the work-energy theorem in detail
  • Learn about energy conservation in mechanical systems
  • Explore the concept of significant figures in scientific calculations
  • Practice problems involving projectile motion and energy transformations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of energy conservation and motion dynamics.

Shah 72
MHB
Messages
274
Reaction score
0
A golf ball of mass 45.9g is hit from a tee with speed 180km/ h. The ball rises to a height of 20m having traveled along a curved path of length 61.875m. At the highest point of its path the ball is traveling at 144 km/h
a) Find the magnitude of the avg resistance force acting on the golf ball.
I got the and resistance =0.2N

The ball travels a further 105.8m along a curved path to land on the green. The green is 4m lower than the tee. The average resistance remains unchanged
b) find the speed of the ball just before it lands on the green
I got the ans v= 35m/s

The ball is traveling vertically when it lands on the green, where it is immediately brought to rest.
C) show that the energy absorbed by the green is 30.3J
I don't know how to work this out. Pls help
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Shah 72 said:
I don't know how to work this out. Pls help
You don't know how to work what part out? Again, we can't really help you until we know what you are having troubles with! You have posted a number of problems without showing us anything about what you don't know. This has to end.

Let's start from the beginning. This problem is going to involve the work-energy theorem. You have been shown the form of this equation several times here so please start by telling us what the equation is and what your question is.

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
You don't know how to work what part out? Again, we can't really help you until we know what you are having troubles with! You have posted a number of problems without showing us anything about what you don't know. This has to end.

Let's start from the beginning. This problem is going to involve the work-energy theorem. You have been shown the form of this equation several times here so please start by telling us what the equation is and what your question is.

-Dan
It's question c iam not able to solve
 
Shah 72 said:
It's question c iam not able to solve
Since the ball didn't bounce (and we technically don't have to assume that) the green absorbed all the kinetic energy that the ball had when it landed. So that would be...

I ran through the whole problem and you are not off by much. I suspect that you are not carrying enough decimal places when you are rounding. Keep 5 or so significant digits. I got 0.1884 N for part a, 33.888 m/s for part b, and 26.356 J for part c. I couldn't replicate your results so I don't know where you might be off.

-Dan
 
Ok
topsquark said:
Since the ball didn't bounce (and we technically don't have to assume that) the green absorbed all the kinetic energy that the ball had when it landed. So that would be...

I ran through the whole problem and you are not off by much. I suspect that you are not carrying enough decimal places when you are rounding. Keep 5 or so significant digits. I got 0.1884 N for part a, 33.888 m/s for part b, and 26.356 J for part c. I couldn't replicate your results so I don't know where you might be off.

-Dan
Thank you so much for replying.
According to textbook the ans in 0.2N for q(a)
So for q(a)
m= 0.0459kg, u= 50m/s, h=20m, s=61.875m, highest point v=40m/s
So Increase in KE= 1/2mv^2- 1/2mu^2=-20.655J
Increase in GPE= mgh=9.18J
Work done against resistance = -F×S=-61.875F
So I get F= 0.2N as given in the textbook
For (b) s=105.8, h= 20-4= 16m, u=50m/s
Increase in KE=0.02295v^2-57.375J
Increase in GPE= 7.344J
Work done against resistance =-21.16J
So I get v=35.4m/s, as mentioned in the textbook I rounded it to 35 m/s.
I don't understand how to calculate q(c). I don't know what components to consider.
 
I
topsquark said:
Since the ball didn't bounce (and we technically don't have to assume that) the green absorbed all the kinetic energy that the ball had when it landed. So that would be...

I ran through the whole problem and you are not off by much. I suspect that you are not carrying enough decimal places when you are rounding. Keep 5 or so significant digits. I got 0.1884 N for part a, 33.888 m/s for part b, and 26.356 J for part c. I couldn't replicate your results so I don't know where you might be off.

-Dan
If I consider the final KE the ball lands = -28.11J
Final GPE= -1.836 J by taking h=4m
Work done against resistance = -0.2×4=-0.8J
So total will be 30.7. I don't get 30.3J .is this OK?
 
topsquark said:
Since the ball didn't bounce (and we technically don't have to assume that) the green absorbed all the kinetic energy that the ball had when it landed. So that would be...

I ran through the whole problem and you are not off by much. I suspect that you are not carrying enough decimal places when you are rounding. Keep 5 or so significant digits. I got 0.1884 N for part a, 33.888 m/s for part b, and 26.356 J for part c. I couldn't replicate your results so I don't know where you might be off.

-Dan
Can you pls pls explain an easy method how to calculate the energy gained by the green when the ball falls. If I get the concept right, I can calculate with similar problems. Iam not understanding which energy to take whether it's initial energy or its the final energy when the ball hits the green. Pls
 
I'm not sure what you are asking for. The best I can come up with is to say that if the ball lands and does not bounce then all of it's kinetic energy is absorbed by the green. That's simply a matter of energy conservation.

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
I'm not sure what you are asking for. The best I can come up with is to say that if the ball lands and does not bounce then all of it's kinetic energy is absorbed by the green. That's simply a matter of energy conservation.

-Dan
Ok got it. Thank you so much!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K