Work: Kinetic Friction + Applied Resultant Force

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the work done by a pulling force on a 20kg box being pulled across a flat surface at a constant speed. The coefficient of kinetic friction is 0.40, and participants emphasize the importance of understanding the forces acting on the box, particularly the balance of forces in both the horizontal and vertical directions. It is clarified that the pulling force must equal the kinetic friction force when the box moves at constant speed. Additionally, participants suggest breaking down the pulling force into its horizontal and vertical components to accurately recalculate the normal force and the kinetic friction. Understanding these components is crucial for determining the work done on the box.
HumKinStudent
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The coefficient of kinetic friction between a 20kg box and the floor is 0.40 -> How much work does a pulling force applied 37 degrees above the horizontal do on the box in pulling it 8.0m across the floor at constant speed


Homework Equations



F(kinetic)= F(normal) x U(kinetic)

W=Fxd

Fx=Fcos(theta)

The Attempt at a Solution


I solved for kinetic friction, I'm just not 100% sure where to go next, a hint would be more helpful in the long run than the answer to the entire question... I was thinking of assuming that force in the x direction should be equal to F(kinetic) and then just multiplying f(kinetic) by the distance 8 metres... Nonetheless I feel like there is more to it...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
HumKinStudent said:
I'm just not 100% sure where to go next, a hint would be more helpful in the long run than the answer to the entire question... I was thinking of assuming that force in the x direction should be equal to F(kinetic) and then just multiplying f(kinetic) by the distance 8 metres... Nonetheless I feel like there is more to it...

There cannot be a single force in the x-direction if the box is moving at constant speed. Do you see why?
 
kuruman said:
There cannot be a single force in the x-direction if the box is moving at constant speed. Do you see why?

if the box is moving at constant speed in the x direction then the force MUST be equal to the kinetic friction, correct?

Should I go back, make my sum of Forces in the y = 0 and recalculate the normal force by factoring in the y component of the force, instead of assuming the normal force is the opposite of the box's weight x gravity?

This will change my kinetic force of friction...
 
HumKinStudent said:
if the box is moving at constant speed in the x direction then the force MUST be equal to the kinetic friction, correct?

It is correct to say that, because the speed is constant, the component of the pulling force in the horizontal direction and the force of kinetic friction add to zero.

Should I go back, make my sum of Forces in the y = 0 and recalculate the normal force by factoring in the y component of the force, instead of assuming the normal force is the opposite of the box's weight x gravity?

This will change my kinetic force of friction...

Yes you should and consider the component of the pulling force perpendicular to the incline.
 
kuruman said:
It is correct to say that, because the speed is constant, the component of the pulling force in the horizontal direction and the force of kinetic friction add to zero.



Yes you should and consider the component of the pulling force perpendicular to the incline.

there is no incline in this question, it is on a flat surface, nonetheless, I should still break down the resultant force...
 
Yes, there is no incline, I got confused. You should break down the puling force into horizontal and vertical components. Since the acceleration is zero, the sum of all the horizontal components must be zero and the sum of all the vertical components must be zero.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K