Work needed to stop a rolling hoop

  • Thread starter Thread starter IAmPat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rolling Work
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The work required to stop a rolling hoop with a mass of 7.8 kg and a center of mass speed of 0.23 m/s can be calculated using the kinetic energy formula. The total kinetic energy (KE) consists of both translational and rotational components, expressed as KE = (1/2)mvcm2 + (1/2)Iω2. The moment of inertia (I) for a thin hoop is I = mr2, and the relationship between linear velocity (v) and angular velocity (ω) is given by v = rω. Therefore, the work done to stop the hoop is equal to the negative of its total kinetic energy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinetic energy equations
  • Familiarity with rotational dynamics
  • Knowledge of moment of inertia for different shapes
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Calculate the total kinetic energy of a rolling hoop using specific values
  • Explore the relationship between linear and angular velocity in rolling motion
  • Learn about the moment of inertia for various geometric shapes
  • Study the work-energy principle in the context of rotational motion
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of rolling objects and the principles of kinetic energy and work in rotational motion.

IAmPat
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A thin hoop of mass 7.8kg rolls on a horizontal floor with a speed (at its center of mass) of 0.23 m/s. How much work must be done on the hoop to bring it to a stop.


Homework Equations



m = 7.8kg
Vcm = 0.23m/s

KE = 1/2*m*Vcm + 1/2Iw2

I = m*r2

The Attempt at a Solution



So the work done on the hoop to increase its KE is positive, so the work needed to stop it would be the same, but negative.

KE = 1/2*m*Vcm + 1/2*I*w2
KE = 1/2*(7.8)*(0.23) + 1/2*(m*r2) * w2

This is all I have, I don't know how to find all the necessary variables when I'm only given the mass and velocity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
r is required, you can't do without that unless one of these is mentioned:
1. There is no or negligible angular velocity
2. The radius is negligibly small
 
First, you should use the correct equation:

KE = KEtranslational + KErotational = (1/2)mvcm2 + (1/2)Iw2


You should know (and use) the relationship between the tangetial velocity of a rotating wheel and w. It is this: v = wr


From this, you can see that w and r can be free to be anything as long as their product is V. This is also why neither were mentioned in the problem.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K